on 04-05-2016 1:30 PM
Hi All,
I am facing an error in interface( picking an Idoc from ECC and posting it to HCM, no mapping involved):
error: Transmitting the message to endpoint <local> using connection IDoc_AAE_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: com.sap.engine.services.ts.transaction.TxRollbackException: Current transaction is marked for rollback
MP: exception caught with cause java.lang.NullPointerException: while trying to load from a null object array loaded from local variable 'objects'
any suggestions for resolution.
Thanks.
Hi Vijay,
Have you checked this note 1826405 - IDoc_AAE TxRollbackException when CREADAT is not specified?
Regards.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Iñaki Vila,
Thank you for the note.
I confirmed with the basis nothing has changed from their end. Till yesterday it was working fine, and today its giving me the nullpointer exception. And confirmed with the user, that they have received all the idocs we sent. Just want to know the cause of error.
Thank you.
Hi Vijay,
Check the in your ico object how have you configure the staging option, set it to MODE_STORE_AND_RETURN
(1979353 - Recurring TxRollbackException with MODE_STORE_ON_ERROR stage configuration) It seems not to affect your PI version, but you can try.
Regards.
Hi Vijay,
I see this occasionally when folks get the adapter module chain out of order. Do you have any extra modules setup in your scenario? And if so, what is the order?
Regards,
Ryan Crosby
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Ryan,,
Is it causing because of order is not matching with the Input file and the (Receiver channel) Idoc Control Headers in configuration:
as in the inputfile, its mentioned as:
<SNDPOR>abcd</SNDPOR><SNDPRT>LS</SNDPRT><SNDPRN>xyz</SNDPRN>
in the receiver channel Idoc control headers:
Please let me know,if this is the reason causing failure, why it did not happened before as nothing is changed now.
Thanks for the help.
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.