on 04-02-2016 2:26 PM
Dear Members
My Second Query Related to WBS changes done in PR.
1. WBS Changed in PR
2. Stock in New WBS ; PO and GRN also done in New WBS
3. When i am doing Material issue system is posting actual costs against Original WBS and reducing Actual Cost from New WBS . Is there any program wherein we can correct this behaviour.
Regards
Hi,
Is the PR created through CJ20N or through ME51N
Regards
Terence
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear Ternece
This PR is created through ME51N ; we normally create PR's through CJ20N wherein change of WBS is not allowed once PR created; in this case a New User created manually through ME51N and hence WBS could be changed. Now we have problem that at time of issue of Material Costs are being assigned to Original WBS .
Regards
Ajitabh
Hi,
In the change log, it shows the changes are done in CJ20N.
You have changed the WBS element, but the cost accumulated in the old WBS element based on the network, your screenshot confirms it.
So the PR is account assigned to Network, Go to the PR and check whether this is account assignment to Network or WBS, if network, check in CJ20N to which WBS element it belongs
Regards
Terence
Thanks Terence for your updates.
PR is created against WBS but as you rightly said network has assignment to Old WBS only. Hence system is checking availability control against old WBS. I changed assignment in network but no use. Now i am not able to issue Material as no budget against Old WBS. . I deactivated budget control in my refreshed test system . When I issue the material it reduces actual cost posted against new WBS while posts actual costs against Old WBS.
Now what are the possible options for me as this activity has been done in lot of PR's and we are stuck up with capitalisation
Screenshot for New WBS in PRD Server
Screenshot for New WBS in QAS server on removing budget check and issue Material; no netwok assignment in New WBS
Screenshot old WBS in QAS server where actual costs get hitThanks
Hi,
This makes sure, SAP is working well. As of now, the cost are booked into old WBS element.
1. You can transfer the cost from that WBS element to New WBS Element or create a settlement rule and settle to new WBS element.
2. You need to make sure the correct network activity is assigned to correct WBS element. Change the assignment in CJ20N to make sure. Else create a new activity and assign it to the new WBS element.
Discuss with your FI team on moving the cost.
Regards
Terence
User | Count |
---|---|
95 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.