on 03-28-2016 6:55 AM
Hi all,
I have an interface MS SQL to ECC configured in my landscape and it's working fine. The JDBC adapter polls every 15 minutes and pick the last 24 hours data. Few days back the SQL system was down for two days and they missed a days data.
The client is not ready to allow to use flag field. They have provided an InsertionDateTime field.
How can I modify the interface so that even if the system is down for two days, the data will not be lost?
Can it be made ECC - MS SQL synchronous with the use of stored procedures at receiver system to use timestamp as a condition for the data to be picked?
Any suggestions would be appreciated
Regards
Harish
Hi Harish,
I can think anyway to control with sender jdbc. I think the best way is to control from ECC like you said, you can do a job every day with two characteristics, the first to know if the connection is broken or not and the second to do the select only if in the ECC system there are not registers in the insertionDateTime period. Then you can do a proxy - mail to inform you and other responsibles about a possible case of an issue.
Regards.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Harish,
What do you mean by connection is broken or not?
You have to talk with the DB to activate a standard stored procedure for this purpose http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1248423/how-to-see-active-sql-server-connections
You can do a ECC - JDBC scenario to call this stored procedure a check its availability.
Regards.
Hi Inaki
The design that I am doing is this!
There is a field InsertionDateTime in MS SQL which is auto populated every time a record is inserted to the database. I pull the value to the ECC system
ECC will search the tables and find the highest value for InsertionDateTime in records. Then it will send that value of InsertionDateTime to MS SQL. MS SQL will use that field and poll all data that have a date timestamp greater than that of InsertionDataTime.
This will be updated back to ECC. While picking the fields I will update the insertionDatetime in ECC
If I am doing this, can I do this without stored procedure?
I am using a synchronous receiver JDBC databse.
Can I use this here?
Harish
Hi Harish,
>>>MS SQL will use that field and poll all data that have a date timestamp greater than that of InsertionDateTime
How are you going to do this without writing the stored procedure? You must use stored procedure for this because date value is dynamic in the select query.
Regards,
Praveen.
Hi Praveen,
Can't the requirement of mine be met using this blog
Here, I would use the InsertionDateTime as a value. The ECC always sent a fixed value for that.
Say if it sends, 31:03:2016 12:00:00 then I use this value and pick records with timestamp greater than value
Harish
The interface was done without using Stored procedure
Created sender synchronous proxy and JDBC receiver synchrnous proxy
JDBC, I created two structures. MT_XYZ_Request and MT_XYZ_Request_response
MT_XYZ_Request structure
MT_XYZ_Request
Statement
dbTable
action
access
I gave action as SQL_QUERY
For access I did a mapping
Constant
concat access
InsertionDateTime
In the InsertionDateTime, the value will be sent from ECC
In Constant I wrote the SQL query select A, B, C, D, E, InsertionDateTime from <dbTable> where InsertionDateTime >=
This was concatenated with the dynamic value that I got from ECC and passed to the access field
This is now working fine, thanks for all the inputs
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Harish,
You may query your ECC system to check when was the interface executed last and accordingly send a sync request to the MSSQL db to fetch the new records when the insertionDateTime in db is more than the last execution time in ECC. Both these can be scheduled in a job in ECC, just like Inaki said.
Regards,
Diptee
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.