cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

High Rack with 6 n 7 deep from two sides

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

In a High rack Storage , there are 3 levels.

Front Side of the Rack :

Each bin can accommodate 6 Pallets.(6 deep)

The Pallets are pushed horizontally in the bin.

Back Side of the Rack :

Each bin can accommodate 7 Pallets (7 deep)

The Pallets are pushed horizontally in the bin.

Forklift access is available from both sides.

Homogeneous Materials of same batch are stored in a bin.

Which specific storage type should be used ?

Which type of putaway strategy will be suitable?

Removal is not required on FIFO , as usually single batch

material is stored in a bin.

Please suggest.

Thanks / Vinod

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

MANIS
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

if you have access from both the side and each physical location (6 deep or 7 deep)  is having separate identification number with individual access then my suggestion is you can go ahead with HRS with next empty bin

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks Manish !

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Manish

Thanks for your earlier reply , one more question on this.

We can store 6 or 7 Pallets in a bin as above. Which capacity method we can use in such case to determine and fix that a particular bin will have only 6 or only 7 Pallets ?

All pallets being used in this storage type are of same size (same type) and of the same material.

Thanks in advance / Vinod

harshesh_patel3
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Vinod,

In your situation perhaps capacity check method 5 is useful.

Define your usages per SUT when you define your SUTs.

Also maintain the maximum usage per bin in Bin Master.

Depending on how your shipments are coming, you might also want to check placement strategy
"I". It will switch to logic for "L" if it cannot find an existing bin.

Hope this helps.

Thanks

HP

Answers (0)