DDIC Activation failed for one of the structures

[Former Member]

Hi,

We are getting error while Replicating this source system ECC & CRM tables. Trigers are not getting created & giving the error-

DDIC activation failed for one of the structures listed below :

1. BUT_HIER_NODE:

2. EKPO

3. LFA1

Screenshot attached below.

Need some light on this if anyone has seen this situation.

[Saritha_K]

Hi,

Have you replicated the main DD* tables (namely DD02L, DD02T, DD08L) before replicating the ones shown in your error picture?

These tables contain meta data information for replication of other tables present in the sender system.(applicable for sap sources specifically)

Regards,

Saritha K

[Former Member]

Hi Saritha,

All other tables have been replicated successfully except these 3 tables.

DD* are already replicated after creation of SLT Configurtaion..

[Former Member]

Saritha,

I just dropped DD08L table & tried to replicate this table but no entries are appearing for this table.

Any idea how to replicate DD08L?

[Former Member]

DD08L issue resolved.. But these tables we are still having the issue DDIC Activation issue..

[Saritha_K]

Hi,

what is your DMIS version?

have you applied all correction notes?

Also can you check ST22, SM21 for more details on the issue?

One more thing, are you using DDIC user for your RFC connections by any chance?

Regards,

Saritha

[Former Member]

HI,

DMIS--SP9, all correction notes applied.

No we are not using DDIC user for RFC's.

All other tables have been replicated except these 4. Just to share you 1 more additional information is that these tables are already in replication mode with same source system but pointing to different HANA system.These tables are working fine there.

Anything I can do from Source system?

[Saritha_K]

Hi,

have you activated the multiple configurations allowed check?

Please refer to below discussion where similar requirement was there.

How to Replicate the same Table twice but in tw... | SCN

Regards,

Saritha

[Former Member]

Were you able to find a solution for this? we are facing similar issue for AUFK table?

Raj