on 11-23-2015 7:37 AM
Hi Experts;
While executing Classic RE to RE-FX migration (using t-code REMICL)- on step 15- "Required Postprocessing" I encountered errors in migrated sales based contracts where in the condition type "140 Sales based rent AP" has been migrated twice- one with the calc formula "Fixed amount" & the other with the calc formula "Sales Based Rent".
The reason for the occurrence of Sales based rent AP condition twice is due to a business scenario wherein -
Condition Type | CalcFrom Name | Unit Price | |
---|---|---|---|
140 Sales based rent AP | Fixed Amount | 1.00 | |
140 Sales based rent AP | Sales-based rent | ||
One of the sales based rent condition (with the calc formula: Fixed amount) is calculated as 1% of the monthly net sales;
the second sales based rent condition (with calc formula: Sales based rent) is purely a sales based rent condition.
Since, both the rent conditions have been migrated with the same condition type, therefore, system shows an error:
"Condition Sales bsd rent AP with valid-from date 27.06.2014 already exists". The error details can be seen in the attached screen shots.
There are around 3000+ migrated contracts with the same error. How can I fix this error of same condition types migrated for the same rental conditions?
Appreciate your early response as this error is a showstopper in the competion of the design phase of the project.
Thanks
Shantanu Kar
Dear Shantanu,
Please refer this link http://scn.sap.com/thread/1537465.
You can create same condition with same validity period by differentiate “Condition purpose” in contract.
Regards
Sudhir
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Shantanu,
As you are trying to assign same condition type with same validity it is throwing an error,
I think you should create new condition type to rectify this.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
13 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.