on 11-23-2015 9:01 AM
Hi,
Can we use value mapping in routing condition inside iFlow?
Br,
Madan
Hi Madan,
Why not to do the value mapping at mapping level to have the field yet mapped at routing level?. AFAIK, you can't do a value mapping in a routing condition (Defining Receiver and Routing Conditions - Integration Directory - SAP Library)
Regards.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Even if I use 1:N mapping (along with value mapping) but still it will not useful because incase both condition not satisfied then it will not process for any interface and will fail at runtime. I do not want to get it failed so I was looking for a solution where we could put condition during routing.
Br,
Madan
Hi Madan,
I do not know if it make sense receving a messages that are not to be delivered to any receiver system but in case thisis your requirement the only option is to use the Receciver Determination Extended (to be able to user your Value Mapping look-up) an apply the same rules you are to apply in the Interface Determination to guarantee that at least one inbound interface will be determined. In case the Receiver Determination fails and no receiver is found (that means that no interface would have been determined in the Interfce Determination) you can set it up in order to not create an error at runtime.
Hope it helps.
User | Count |
---|---|
72 | |
26 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.