on 11-05-2015 10:34 PM
We have a database that has a series of unrelated tables. Is it bad idea to have those unrelated tables in the same universe?
Thanks
Hi,
Yes,It's not a good practice or i can say bad design.If you are going to put the unrelated tables then users must know which objects they have to select creating objects and when they will get the errors or wrong result.
This approach is more based on the limited users community and they should know how this will work.If users doesn't know i would suggest don't go for this approach.
In one of my project we went for this approach but in that case users were used to with this approach and they forced to go with this.
Amit
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Rather than use contexts for this, use aggregate navigation. It's not what aggregate navigation was designed for but it's something that I've used it for in the past. Typically you'd use it in an OLTP schema. As Amit says, you wouldn't generally put disparate tables in the same universe but it can often be the case that the same target audience would need them both.
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.