LWF - Maharastra

[Former Member]

Dear All,

I am facing one issue in the LWF part. I have done the necessary configuration. Please find the attached screen shot.

1. LWF should deduct in the month of June and December for Maharashtra.

2. Employee is in LOP(29 days) for the month of June, his/her gross salary(10K) got reduced to 599. System is deducting based on gross salary.

But, clients are saying its based on Actual salary.

What is the actual process of Maharashtra. Could you please let me know if I missed out any configuration.

Regards,

Vijay Kumar K.B

[Former Member]

Hi all,

I post this query to SAP. SAP has replied

" Could you please provide us with a legal document which says the LWF

should be deducted considering the actual salary of an employee?

The document would help us to take the issue further."

Once it solved, I will close the post.

Regards,

Vijay Kumar K.B

[Former Member]

Dear Vijay,

Same schema settings for my client also, dont change any thing in schema and do the table changes like below:

Table: V_T7INU3

LWF   13    LWMH01  3  HALF-YEARLY  ___  ___  INCUD

Table: V_T7INU5

LWMH01   1          3000.00    6.00  18.00    6.00 18.00  INR

LWMH01   2 10,000.000.00  12.00  36.00  12.00 36.00 INR

Table: V_T7INW3

Maharashtra  12.00   36.00   3  Half-yearly  INR  01.01.1900  31.12.9999

change the table to these values and test it.

Best Regards,

Praneeth kumar

[Former Member]

I maintained all these table.

But my query is if the employee is in LOP, how the LWF will process its on gross salary or actual salary???

Regards,

Vijay Kumar K.B

[Former Member]

Dear Vijay,

/140 LWF Basis it will check the Gross salary not Actual salary.

[Former Member]

Dear Praneeth,

But my clients are saying it should calculates based on actual salary.

So, I just wanted to confirm from the experts what would be the process.

Even without maintaining CC 40, LWF is calculating.

Anyhow I will check  once with them and I will get back to you.

Regards,

Vijay Kumar K.B

[Former Member]

Dear Vijay,

LWF will not check any ceiling amount like ESI 15000/-. system will deduct directly the amount what you mention in the table V_T7INW3 you can cross check for full  month salaried employee too. how much LWF is deducting.

Best Regards

[Former Member]

LWF is deducting of Rps. 6 & 12 based on gross salary.

But, due to LOP his salary got reduced to 599. In this case system is deducting rps. 6.

Clients are saying, it should be 12 rps.

Regards,

Vijay Kumar K.B

[Former Member]

I suggest you activate the function INLWF & comment INUCD. Also maintain the values in v_t7inw3.

[Former Member]

Can you send a screenshot of v_t7inw3.

[Former Member]

Do we need to maintain this table??

But I already defined the contribution in t7inu5..

Regards,

Vijay Kumar K.B

[Former Member]

Ok, in our case, we maintain this table. Am not sure if it matters if you already defined it in t7inu5. But can you try it anyway?

[Former Member]

Its already defined in the system. If I want to go ahead with this table, then I need to add the grouping in t7inw1 and also need to change in the schema.

But tell me one thing, In case of LOP what system's calculating is correct or not??

Regards,

Vijay Kumar K.B

[Former Member]

Why do you need to change it in the schema?

[Former Member]

I was looking into this issue in scn. I saw some discussion he has mentioned, we need to un comment the function INLWF in the schema.

Really, I don't about this.

[Former Member]

Do not comment INLWF as this calculates LWF. In my system the function INUCD is commented. Is there any reason you are using this?

[Former Member]

I didn't comment INLWF.

I just copy the std schema to custom schema.

I will try it and get back to you.

Regards,

Vijay Kumar K.B

[Former Member]

Hi Tania/Praneeth,

I can't make use of V_T7INW3. Because LWF calculation based on Gross amount.

Upto 3000 its 6 Rps.

        >3001 its 12 Rps.

Regards,

Vijay Kumar K.B