on 10-30-2015 7:30 AM
Dear All,
I am having one scenario regarding suspension case.
We are maintaining suspension action and suspension leave in the system. Whenever employee goes for suspension with pending en query as a reason will run the action and will maintain the IT 2001 for a particular to reduce his/her salary.
Ex: Employee is in suspension from 15.07.2015 to 16.09.2015. In this case, employee should get regular salary of 14 days with statutory effect for the month july and 15-30 days as subsistence allowance without statutory effect in the payslip.
In the month of Aug, he/she should get only Subsistence allowance without statutory effect in the payslip.
In the month of Sept, 1-16 Subsistence allowance and remaining days should be with regular salary.
How to achieve this scenario.
Below are the PCR return for suspension case. I placed after X023.
This is how we handle suspensions in my client's process:
1) Two action types - Suspension & Withdrawal of Suspension which do not change employment status of the employee
2) When the Suspension action is executed, IT 8 is copied effective the suspension date with only one wage type - Subsistence allowance. This wage type is configured such that there is no statutory effect.
3) When the Withdrawal of Suspension action is execute, IT 9 is once again restored effective the action start date, the original wage types are entered in It 8.
There is no entry made in IT 2001 for the suspension period.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Taniya,
Thanks for input. Its useful let me work around on same concept.
If there is any possibility to control on PCR level just let me know.
In our case we are maintaining IT 2001 for suspension because first 90 days salary should be calculated 75% if more than 90days salary should be calculated 25% of his/her actual salary
Regards,
Ashutosh Katekar
Ok, the situation is
suppose employee XYZ has been suspended from 15 Nov 2015 then we will update IT 2001 suspension leave and xyz will receive salary 75% of his actual gross. suppose his suspension continues for 90 days then for 3 months he will continue to receive 75% salary.
If suspension prolongs for next month i.e 4th Month then salary should be 25% of his/her actual gross salary.
So we are passing the time wage types for 75% and 25% through absence evaluation.
Instead of maintaining manually in IT8 as a suspension allowance i want to control on PCR level.
Regards,
Ashutosh Katekar
We are not running any time evaluation. In the absence valuation I am maintaining the percentage for suspension absence type and passing the value to one wage type.
Ex: 15.07.2015 - 30.07.2015 Suspension period, so in this case TAKU** will get update with 8.50 and passing the value to one wage type for payslip purpose.
So based on the above PCR system is calculating gross salary. But client want bifurcation .on regular and subsistence salary separately.
Hi,
See, ex: Basic Salary - 5000 (PC 10 -1 )
HRA - 5000 (PC 10 -1 )
Commutation allowance - 10000 (PC 10 -0 ).
From 01-07-2015 - 14-07-2015 and 15-07-2015 - 30-07-2015(Suspension period) .
Payslip should contain ,
Basic salary - 2333
HRA - 2333
Commutation allowance - 5000
Subsistence allowance - 5334.
Next period : only subsistence allowance.
Regards,
Ashutosh katekar
Ok, will not change the existing rule as I assume it is working correctly. I suggest the below solution:
1) The absence types for Suspension 90 days & post 90 days will be valuated as unpaid.
2) We will create a new PCR that will compute wage type value from IT8 (or 14 or 15) - wage type value after factoring due to suspension. The result will be stored in a variable. After this PCR is processed for all wage types that should be factored due to suspension, the variable will be updated with:
/101 (whole month assuming no suspension) - /101 for part of the month where employee is not suspended
4) We will create a new PCR to calculate subsistence allowance based on time wage type(there will be a different time wage type for each absence type Suspension & post 90 days suspension).
If the time wage type is Suspension, then subsistence allowance will be calculated as 75% of the variable from step 3.
If the time wage type is Post 90 days suspension, subsistence allowance=25% of the variable.
Please confirm if the approach is ok with you, will then guide you in detail.
Hi,
I will accept your solution. Currently I am using two PCR for suspension.
when there is split in the Actions, in our example I am not disturbing the first split instead of passing the second split to one variable called &ABCD.
In my second PCR, I queried based on action type(suspension) and took the variable value of ABCD and pass it to subsistence allowance component. The subsistence component contents the 18 days period amount(14-07-2015 - 30-07-2015).
But in the RT all the wage types are saved without splits. Because, of this Basic salary and other components contents 30 days amount together.
So, please help on this.
Regards,
Ashutosh Katekar
Ok, for the solution that i have mentioned earlier, the first step is to make both these valuation rules 100% unpaid. The reason for this is that we do not want the regular wage types to be computed at all for the suspension period. Instead we want subsistence allowance in that period which we will be calculated through different PCRs. So can you make the change in valuation rules effective whichever date you want this solution.
1) Check step 2 & 4 of the solution i designed earlier. We are first finding out original gross(before factoring) - new gross (after suspension factoring). This result gives us the gross for suspension period. We will then multiply the gross for suspension period by 50% or 75% based on the suspension type.
2) We are printing the regular wagetypes only for the non-suspension period. We do not wabnt these wage types in the suspension period since during suspension:
a) Only subsistence allowance is applicable which is calculated above
b) No statutory impact is required hence all regular wage types should not be present
So regular wage types will exist with the amounts for the non-suspension period, for the suspension period subsistence allowance will exist.
User | Count |
---|---|
91 | |
8 | |
7 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.