Skip to Content

Archived discussions are read-only. Learn more about SAP Q&A

Remuneration Statement is incorrect when For-Period recalculated twice

Hello experts,

I am seeing an issue when a For-Period is retroactively calculated a second time (both times there are retro differences to be paid) and the Remuneration Statement is displaying the total difference even though part of the retro was paid on the previous check during the first retro calculation. My example is:

- In-Period 19/2015 had retro back to For-Period 18/2015 for AMT = 53.87. Remuneration Statement displayed correctly (i.e. "R" for wage type/hours/PERNR/amount).

- Employee's department then reported more hours in period 18/2015 for an additional amount owed to employee equaling 365.75. So In-Period 20/2015 also had retro back to For-Period 18/2015, but the Remuneration Statement displayed the total amount of retro incorrectly as 419.62 (Retro AMT paid in In-Period 19/2015 plus retro AMT paid in In-Period 20/2015).

I have played in PE51 with the different setting for "Cumulation ID" for our custom form and played with setting on program RPCEDTU0_CE to no avail.

I think this maybe an issue for SAP to resolve, but wanted to ask the group first if they had similar experience and a resolution.


Larry Suttles

University of Cincinnati

Not what you were looking for? View more on this topic or Ask a question