on 10-12-2015 1:43 PM
Hi SAP Gurus,
The Negative Inventory is not working for SAP SD process. Please let me know why. I have done the configuration part in OMJ1 and also at Material Master level. But when i tried to create a sales order for single material whose stock is zero, it is confirming ATP check.
Please guide.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Kundan
Please clarify what is the business case and what you are trying to accomplish.
What has 'negative stocks allowed' setting got to do with ATP check rule A?
MMBE and CO09 represent different information for materials - one is for the current stock sitation and the second shows requested/confirmed quantities for specific dates.
In case you would like to understand why the schedule line in the sales order was confirmed, you can use report SDRQCHCK (via SE38) to investigate potential master data or configuration problems.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I have done the configuration part in OMJ1 and also at Material Master level.
Share the related screen shots to understand what you have done.
G. Lakshmipathi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Sir.
Thanks for your reply.
I am just assuming, that if i removed the ATP check from the sales order level, then whether it will affect PP or MM point of view ?
Since we have both internal procurement as well as external procurement.
Please confirm, i am little bit confuse with MM and PP end. In simple word, if i remove the ATP check from the material master it will not going to affect PP or MM process ?
Once again thanks in advance.
Regards,
Kundan
You are just a test away from finding the answer yourself, so why not spending 2 minutes to execute MD03 (display results before save - but do not save) then change ATP check to KP and run MD03 again and compare your results.
Also searching SCN with keywords: MRP ATP returns more than 2000 results, if you restrict the results to documents, then you immediately get to this one
The first section has an answer, still you can only confirm it for yourself after you tested it.
It also has a reference to an OSS note, which is even more trustworthy, but nothing gets you more experience than testing it yourself
User | Count |
---|---|
103 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.