on 04-19-2007 8:43 AM
Hi all,
I am working on a POC which uses FCC. The expected XML file Structure at the Receiver side is:
<root>
. <substructureA>
<field1/>
<substructure1>
<field1/>
<field2/>
<\substructure1>
<substructure2>
<field1/>
<field2/>
<\substructure2>
<\substructureA>
<substructureB>
<substructure1>
<field1/>
<field2/>
<\substructure1>
<substructure2>
<field1/>
<field2/>
<\substructure2>
<\substructureB>
<\root>
Is it possible to perform the conversion by FCC? If Yes, how to specify the substructure inside a substructure in configuration?
Thanks
Chilanka
HI,
Please check your structure is it correct,
we can have the substructure in side another substructure ,
In general these type of file content conversion , we can specify like below
Record Structure : root,sunstructure1,occurences,substructure2,occurrences,substructure3,occur....
processing parameters ;
root.endseparator : 'nl'
structure1.fieldSeparator:,
structure1.fieldnames:give field names....
repeat the above for all substrucuters...
ingorerecordset : true
try
also see the below links
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/04/03/xi-in-the-role-of-a-ftp
Regards
Chilla
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Jai Shankar,
I think the above requirement is for Receiver side , am i correct or not? For sender is different , you nend use another...
Now , in receiver side
Record structure :
ROOT,substructure1,sub_substructure,FIELD,*,substructure2,sub_substructure
<b>Here you have to use the above sustructure name,occurrences</b> if any fields are under that structure and the respective parent will more no of occurrences
In processing parameters
Root.endSaparator : 'nl'
substructure1.fieldNames : (give field names if available if not available then you no need to give these type parameters for that specified substructure)
See my above answer...
Regards
Chilla
Chilla,
Yep. It was at the receiver side. I dint get the requirement correctly.
But again, if you see the structure posted, it is of many level hierarchy and this has no proper sequence. Also, I beleive this is just a sample and at run time the hierarchy may be still complex and different from the structure shown here. So I dont think Content conversion will work here.
Regards,
Jai Shankar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
check this link for the req structure:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/ae/d03341771b4c0de10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
79 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.