cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

subcon process ouput gap during CO Closing

Former Member
0 Kudos

  Hello SAP Gurus,

Good Day Everyone.

right now we  are doing CO closing and we have a gap after CO88 process and we think that possible gap is due to the new subcon process.

Material A is for subcon process

        Material A is configured as ROH with component for issuance to vendor

         Price  control of A is V

        Material A is under a phantom assy that is connected to the FG model.

                     Under Material A we have (Issuance)

                                Material B as ROH

                             

       FI posting for the Subcon Material GR:

          CR  Subcon Output                 1754.97   total cost of the material with cost of material issued to vendor

          DR  Raw material Stock          1754.97

          DR  GR/IR                                702.65     For payment minus the material issue to vendor        

          CR   Subcon Price Diff             702.65

          DB   Material Input                   1052.32

          CR   raw material stock            1052.32

  I have configured

               FRL     - Subcon Price Diff

               VBO    - Material input

               BSV    - subcon output

 

  when we check the issue it like the material input is doubled transaction

              first : during GR of subcon material

              second : during the consumption of the FERT material

Do you think the configuration is correct?

and what could be the possible reason on why I have gap after CO88.

Please enlighten me.

Thank you very much!

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

jason_shao
Employee
Employee
0 Kudos

Dear Lyn,

What do you mean by:

  when we check the issue it like the material input is doubled transaction           

first : during GR of subcon material            

second : during the consumption of the FERT material

You mean the value is doubled in GR and confirmation but not settlement in CO88?

Best regards,

Jason