on 09-28-2015 2:50 AM
As it is not possible in standared SAP or else create a varient for particular document type
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
This message was moderated.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Allow with authorization concept only for movement type 311 and movement type 201(in case of reservation) for users A and B.
Regards,
Biju K
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Check this note if this might be of any help
773003 - MIGO: No authorization object for action/reference document
not in standard
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
It was requested by accounting department that all transfers should be done with reference from a request (reservation, material document) and not simple transfer without refer using "other". This is done so that everything can be trace back easily.
It is possible to say don't use this option but sometimes people just choose the easy way out so it better if we can just hide it.
From my experience it makes a huge difference if you only tell a user "do it that way" compared to explaining him why he should do it that way and not the other way.
If a users recognizes that there is some serious thoughts behind the command then he will usually not deviate from that. And you can make him clear that it is easy to monitor violations against the rules.
We just said it is not possible in standard, but you have the option of exits and BADIs to make your own checks and validations and restrict the posting by sending an error message.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.