on 09-10-2015 5:20 PM
Hello Gurus,
Can anyone please explain an example for the difference of the Standard procedure and keeping lateness to minimum in Late demand fulfillment . What is the downside if i use standard procedure instead of Minimum lateness.
Regards,
Nick
Hi Nick
I am not sure about your scenario but I would also first perform netting run where all your firmed supplies get pegged to respective demand. You have different options like horizon or backward/forward way of netting to assure all your firmed supply get consumed. You can run multiple netting runs with different options to assure you don´t end up in the scenario which has been mentioned by Rahul.
Once you are through with Netting runs, you can execute the planning run.
As Rahul mentioned, please test the different scenario´s to understand and validate the business requirement.
Thanks
Amol
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Nick,
To best of knowledge (and you can even test), in case of standard procedure CTM first tries to use firmed supplies and then create supply proposal accordingly. This means if you demand in September and firmed supply is in October it will first try to use this and will create rest (if required) thereafter. In this case you next un-firmed supply can't be before firmed supply.
In case of Minimum Lateness, it will create un-firmed supplies in September itself to meet demand if your lead time allows. It will not wait for October supply keeping minimum lateness.
I would suggest you to create above scenario and check the results.
Regards
Rahul
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
9 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.