cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Action Usage Report issue

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi All,

Basically it gives different results whether we run the report for a single user or a number of users. If we run the report for a single user and expand the report to include the role through which the transaction is assigned to the user (by selecting "Go" next to "Result Set"), we get one set or roles (or no roles). This seems to be correct:

If we then add more users to the same selection and execute report again, then we get a different result:

Now the report shows an additional role for the user for the same transatction:XXXXX. Looking at the content of this role, shows that the transaction code is not included. Since we want to use this information for the role mapping of existing user to new roles, we want to make sure that we get the correct results.


Kindly advise

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (5)

Answers (5)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Yes I did

former_member192902
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Bose,

I hope you have run the role usage and action usage jobs before executing this report.

Please find the the resulets in the Role mining option where exactly you can find roles with T-codes.

With Regards

Trinadh Bokka

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks.

Please see below

0 Kudos

Dear Customer,

Implement the following notes

2176337 UAM Missing data and functionality in Action Usage Report by User

2193682 Action usage shows incorrect risks for action usage

2202073 UAM Composite role name is empty or incorrect in action usage report

1820135 Issues in Action usage report

Thanks and Regards,

Rafael Guimbala

AGS Primary Support,

SAP Active Global Support

Former Member
0 Kudos

We are at SP12,GRC10