on 08-06-2015 1:26 PM
Hello,
Scenario: scheduling agreement (JIT delivery schedule), 2 schedule lines.
In VL10C I select both schedule lines for the item and create delivery in dialog. The system cumulates both schedule line quantities into a single delivery item.
Requirement is to have each schedule line create an individual delivery item.
What I tried so far:
1. Change the user role in VL10C:
- option SplitSchedLine: set to 2 "One item per schedule line"
- Cumul.rule: tried all options, including leaving it blank
2. Manually changed cumulation quantities in VL10C (tried leavaing them to zero, making the equal to each schedule line's delivery qty etc.)
3. tried VL10E, same options as above.
SAP_APPL version SAPKH61707
Nothing I tried produced the desired results, system keeps cumulating the schedule lines into a single delivery quantity.
Please let me know if you managed to pull this one off and how.
Thank you in advance!
Bolohan,
What happens when you attempt to deliver within VA32?
Best Regards,
DB49
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Bolohan,
I don't believe there is any standard functionality that will ALWAYS give you a 1 to 1 relationship between individual confirmed schedule lines and delivery items. In most companies, this function of combining certain schedule lines into a single delivery item is considered to be a 'feature', not a 'bug'.
You can approach this functionality by implementing certain logical processes related to delivery creation and availability checking. It sounds, though, that your business requirement is to ALWAYS have this happen; without fail.
I believe you will need to use an enhancement to achieve this strict business requirement.
Best Regards & Good luck,
DB49
Solved the isssue by filling VBEP-AESKD with the schedule line number in USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBEP
This is used as a split criteria in SAPFV50C_LIPS_FUELLEN_AUS_VBEP and this particular customer does not use that field.
I guess the alternative is butchering the above mentioned include and add an additional field (etenr) in LPSPLIT, though we did not test this route.
Have a look at the following note:-
G. Lakshmipathi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
In the user role tab settings, for the field List Type, can you maintain value 1 - Index List and test?
Regards,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
95 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.