on 08-05-2015 4:21 PM
we are creating thousands quality info records for specific vendor/material/plant.
our material has several revision levels and if I use QI06, I get the list of all materials AND all revision levels:
that means that I have to select one by one to get the highest revision level.
the problem is that every plant uses another revision level and so table AEOI does not help because I cannot see the plant.
Is there a way that I can find the revision level of all materials according to plant?
thanks Julio
as a matter of fact I was under the same impression/knowledge: that the revision level is common for all plants as it is on client level but to my surprise, when running QI06 this is what I found:
the material is not stored in table AEOI
and different plants have different revision levels
2)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi. When using QI06 you´re actually looking at the quality info records data (QINF table), not the material records data. Check the example material you gave in MM03 transaction and most likely you´ll see '02' as the latest revision regardless the plant. In fact the standard SAP always take the revision level from material as key on quality info records. That´s why we just implemented the OSS note mentioned previously because we have other ways to cover such ECM process. BR, Julio.
Hi. Revision level is always defined on client level for materials. Check following link:
Plant Specific Material Revision | SCN
In our company we just decided to deactivate the material revision level on quality info records with the use of SAP OSS Note 770347. Such procedure eliminated the need of maintaining new q-info records every time a new revision levels was released for the material.
BR, Julio
PS: Just a quick highlight that potential solutions depends on how the Engineering Change Management (aka ECM) process is carried in your company. In our case the above mentioned solution just suited the best our requirements.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
7 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.