on 07-23-2015 3:44 PM
Hi Experts,
Can anyone kindly help me to understand the connection between the below in BRM?
Associate Role Methodology Process to Condition Group
Define Role Methodology Process and Steps
Assign Condition Group Type to BRF+
Does the BRF+ created in Generate BRF Plus section of SPRO has any relationship with the rule used in MSMP for SAP_GRAC_ROLE_APPR process Id?
If I will create a customized rule for role approvals,do i have to maintain the same in Assign Condition Group Type to BRF+?
What is the purpose of generating two rule methodology and approver in spro?
Hello Somik,
As Plaban mentioned every questioned has been answered in provided links
For ZERM_ROLE_METHODOLOGY_RULE
is also like your approver rule for role management,where we need to map the condition groups with role types in decision table,but only difference is we don't use in MSMP
Colleen Lee has put lot of efforts to prepare a document,please refer and follow the same steps
Hope this helps and clarifies you
Regards
Baithi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks all for your time and advise.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Plaban/Baithi,
I had generated ZERM_ROLE_APPROVAL_RULE and defined the decision table as below
If
ROLE_TYPE=SIN
BPROC=FI
CRITLVL=HIGH
then
GRAC_CNDGP=CRITIC
I had created the CRITIC in SPRO and Assign methodology process to condition group
Also I had updated the role owner in NWBC for this CRITIC
what next?am i following right process?
What logic to be build for ZERM_ROLE_METHODOLOGY_RULE and where it will be needed?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks again
So As I understand the rule needs to maintained in MSMP and SPRO both.
This gets called when we initiate approval for a role create/change.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I understand that,but when we "initiate approval" in BRM while role creation,which rule it follows to find the approver?As i don't see the customized BRF+ rule details maintained in MSMP
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Somik,
Answer 1-4 can be found from link given by Srinivas
5. there are 2 types of BRF+ rule ids associated with BRM. One is for Methodology/Approvers and the other is for Workflow.
Both types are created through SPRO. But Methodology deals with the steps that a role will go through. eg. Defintiion-> Auth.>Risk Analysis->Approval-> Generation->Testing
While Workflow only deals with the Path/Stages required for Approval, of a role.
6. No
7. Approver is for default assignment of Role Owner, according to your Attributes, defined in Decision table and then Condition group assignment to Role Owners
Regards
Plaban
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Approver: helps you generate a rule id, to which you map a Condition Group, in Decision table. Then in NWBC->..>Role Owners, you map RoleOwners to Condition Group.
Methodology: Rule id generated gives you a Result Column as 'Condition group' in Decision table . The Condition group value is mapped to Methodology Process, which in turn is mapped to Process(and steps)
MSMP: The Process has a step called Approval. When the role in BRM, reaches this step, a workflow will be triggered. The Workflow is created, by generating Rule id
Thanks again.
Then where the below one is getting used?
Approver: helps you generate a rule id, to which you map a Condition Group, in Decision table. Then in NWBC->..>Role Owners, you map RoleOwners to Condition Group.
If I map a role owner in above step to a condition group and if I map a different agent for approval in MSMP, what will happen?
Hello Somik,
Approval process works and depends on mapped condition groups in role management,
in your case it will gives errors No agent find/approver cannot approve/no request in work inbox
Hence we cannot use another approver who is not mapped to condition group in NWBC.
Let us know if need more details
Regards
Baithi
Hello Somik,
Create BRF+ rule for approver with business process,critical level(not sure same field is available) and condition group in decision table
Now you can maintain approver in NWBC as role owner via condition groups and as role content approver in role maintenance.
When you create a role with attributes like Business process,critical level then approver will be picked from BRF+ approver rule
Refer the link for additional details
Regards
Baithi
Ok.
I was thinking in a different way,Where I will create a BRF+ rule and create a customizing agent.
Then I will use this rule with two diff paths for 2 diff decision tables one for certain business proc and criticality and other one for the rest.
For the first path I will use the customizing agent for approval.
I also thought of mapping this BRF+ details in SPRO of role management.
Hello Somik,
We need to maintain approver rules in step 2-Maintain agent rules
create path and maintain stage settings in step 5-Maintain paths
check page 70,71 for reference
Regards
Baithi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.