OB52 - Current setting problem

[JAMpe]

Hello,

I want to allow the modification of transaction OB52 in a non-production client which is also non modifiable. I normally follow the steps of SAP Note

356483, however, when I'm trying to get the name of the View (customizing Object) in SPRO -> Edit ->  Display IMG Activity -> 'Maint.objects' I get a "IMGDUMMY" value.

I believe that there has been some changes since the correction provided by SAP Note 1993365

Does anyone know how to proceed?

Best regards,

JA

System information: ECC 6.0 EHP7 SPS8

[Former Member]

Hi,

Transaction OB52 maintains view V_T001B
If you need to use the current settings in a system that the role of client is not production and the system is not Modifiable, then please deactivate the transport connection for a object as described in
SAP-note 356483 in your development system and import the transport request in to target system.

The procedure is as below:

   o  Call transaction SE54
   o  Enter the Customizing object (view or table)
   o  Select "Generated objects"
   o  Choose "Create/change"
   o  Select "no, or user, recording routine" in the bottom part of the
    screen
   o  Save the change
   o  You get the message with type warning
     "You are changing a function group which does not belong to you"
     Please confirm this message with 'Enter' and proceed processing.

Best regards

Ruby.

[JAMpe]

Hello Ruby,

Thanks for the reply. I'm not sure about which view should I use:

for example:

When I check the customizing object (view) in SPRO in a ECC 6.0 EHP4 system I get the following:

When I check the customizing object (view) in SPRO in a ECC 6.0 EHP7 SPS3 system I get the following:

However, when I check the customizing object (view) in SPRO in a ECC 6.0 EHP7 SPS8 system I get the following:

Now, how to proceed in the last case, any ideas?

Best regards,

JA

[Former Member]

Hi,

I am also facing the same issue.

a) In Dev it is asking for a transport. Previously it was directly maintainable.

b) In Qlty it is not saving the changes.

Interested to know how your issue got resolved.

Regards,

Sunil