on 07-20-2015 3:29 PM
We are using RMAN to backup the database and we've got below benchmark for backup performance:
DB size: 10T (3.4T table with compression enabled, 4.8T index without compression enabled, 1.8T others).
RMAN compress backup to: 2T
Backup with 10 channels, it will be completed within 6 hours, than the average backup ratio is 50MB/s/channel.
We are monitoring the system and we did not find bottle-neck except those 10 single CPU/Core which is dedicated for each backup channel.
Anybody can provide the your experience (or oracle best practice) for backup ratio under this situation? Is 50MB/s/channel a fair number?
If you do not enable compress of RMAN, pls provide the number.
Thanks in advance,
James
Hi,
you might want to try around with compression algorithm "medium".
(Caution: Requires ACO license when bought from Oracle)
The default might be to CPU costy if you backup to tape.
This could make tape streaming stall because of data being fed too slow
which you do not like to have.
Check out rman command
configure compression ....
Volker
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi James,
> First of all, I wan to know whether this is a good performance even it can be improved
How should we know? We know nothing about your environment like backup device, used buffer settings, used OS, used I/O settings and so on. It is like "I want to know the best car" without specifying what you need.
Just as an example check out my blog post here:
Regards
Stefan
Here is one, but quite old...
www.oracle.com/au/products/database/311357-132408.pdf
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.