on 07-08-2015 12:41 PM
Hi,
I have an issue with one delivery document, 601 movement type did not happen in it.
User changed the schedule line category in sales order and created delivery and invoice for one line item and now he wants 601 to happen
As accounting document also cleared, is their any way to do it manually.
This is urgent issue please
Dear Subash ,
It is not recommended to use the below solution . But if your business accept to use, then only you can proceed other wise please ignore .
kindly check GL's used against the existing movement type which you already delivered and compare with 601 moment type . if it matches then take the abaper help and change the movement type against that delivery in the standard table (ex --MSEG ) through debugging .
Note - Kindly check in the Testing system before doing in production system .
Regards,
C.B Reddy.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi ,
can you explain more about this issue ? first what movement you had done ?
with out goods issue how you have ceated invocie .
601 movement for goods issue only . please clarify .
Regards
venkata rami reddy .konduri
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
venkata,
OP is not saying GI is not complete. GI can be done with other movement types than 601 also. The scenario is that user had choosen a schedule line category manually in the order, which has a movement type other than 601. Goods left the warehouse (PGI) and customer was billed, accounting document was cleared.
Now user wants to do this entire process with 601.
TW
Jobi,
If there is a process in place for the returns for the original sale process, then there might not be an impact, yes money part needs to be checked and this reversal process needs to be checked. But in essence, we don't need to know the movement type.
If there isn't a returns/reversal process, then things get way more complicated.
Thanks for your input!
TW
Hi
Not possible without reversing invoice and changing the schedule line category in sale order. Use has selected some schedule line category which doesn't has movement type 601. Reverse the invoice and change the schedule line category again which has 601 movement type in it.
Thank$
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Subash,
I am not an FI analyst, but if accounting document is cleared, then you should not try to reverse the process. As a test, I tried to cancel an invoice for which accounting document was cleared, and I could cancel.
But I would ask the FI team (client) for advice, before I do anything.
TW
hi subhash,
either you have to cancel the invoice and then reverse goods issue and re-do goods issue with 601 movement type.
Else, give us the details of the movement type used for this goods issue. depending on its accounting entries, you may use some goods movement to create the desired effect.(like through MB1C, etc..)
Thanks
Jobi
Jobi,
There has been a sale of goods, then how your suggestion of goods movement can help reverse the sale?
TW
Else, give us the details of the movement type used for this goods issue. depending on its accounting entries, you may use some goods movement to create the desired effect.(like through MB1C, etc..)
Hi TW,
The OP has to come back and give us the details of the movement type used. We are not sure about the goods movement, and as the billing is done, then we assume that its a sale (stock moved out of SL) . Now, the stock could have moved from a restricted/blocked/safety stock etc..
If the invoice cancellation and reversal of GI is possible then its easy & good. If not then my suggestion may be considered regarding goods movement.
Regards
Jobi
Subash,
What message you get when you try to post the same in VL02n?
Regards
Rahul
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.