on 06-09-2015 6:01 AM
Hi,
I am going as per SAP Note 427944 and SAP documentation at http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/83/218ad1068a11d2bf5d0000e8a7386f/content.htm
I am following the below steps. I am getting the delivery charges at the time of Good receipt, but the Purchase Order condition is not getting either the value or the shipping agent updated from the Shipment Costs From Shipping Cost Document/Forwarding Agent (maintained in Inbound & Shipping Documents)
During MIRO the shipment cost is coming correctly as planned delivery cost but against the vendor against whom the order is placed
Steps | Activity | SAP T-Code |
1 | Purchase Order | ME21N |
2 | Inbound Delivery | VL31N |
3 | Shipment | VT01N |
4 | Shipment Costs | VI01 |
5 | Goods Receipt | VL32N/MIGO |
6 | Invoice | MIRO |
What am I missing? Can any one help?
The goal is that the forwarding agent maintained in inbound delivery shipping documents with the corresponding shipping cost need to be available for planned delivery cost invoices - either by getting it transferred to the conditions as mentioned in note 427944 (Actually it do not explicitly state how the conditions shall get updated)
Regards
Biju
why don't you want to maintain a condition in calculation schema for the clearing agent (Delivery cost )
At the time of PO , you can maintain the clearing value for the clearing agent and if the agent is different , you can maintain clearing vendor .Then you can do MIRO .
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
The approach (conditions maintained in PO) works in a location/client where the freight conditions are applied in minimal orders. If in a case where the business has 99 out of 100 orders shipped from outside the nation using shipping agencies, and neither the agencies or the rates are known at the time of PO creation, it is better to go for the shipping cost route as suggested in the SAP Note 427944
When one deals with monopoly supply vendors with multiple supply locations around the world, the situation become more critical for adopting the shipment cost route that the PO condition route (at the time of creation of PO)
HI Biju,
Your requirement is not clear , be specific and update here what is the main issue you are getting in which steps ? I have seen your process steps , it seems ok but can not get your requirement.
Regards,
Arnab
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
I have created two different conditions in line with both scenarios (2a and 2b). Neither condition is updated. How does the system know which condition is to be updated. I could not find any configuration for condition mappy or copy control between shipping cost condition and purchase order condition
Regards
Biju
Hi all ;
I understand that Biju B Cherian wants to add delivery costs from shipment cost document. There is some restrictions , you can find all details sap note --> 427944 - Info: Shipment costs as delivery costs during goods receipt
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal
What is the different freight components need to be paid to different parties for the following charges
- Shipping Cost
- Clearing Charges
- Warehousing Charges
I believe one condition shall not work. I shall prefer automatic conditions (2B in the note 427944) as in some cases one may not be sure whether certain charges like demurrage shall be required to be paid. Also if multiple shipping companies are there, we may not know whom to pay at the time of PO creation
Regards
Biju
I never said that you must only use one condition. Read the note more carefully, it mentions that you might need to provide one condition multiple times.
However, Clearing charges are not necessarily shipping costs, warehouse charges neither. I don't think there is any way to have SAP automatically find a dependent condition types.
Before you test an over-complicated scenario you should try to get the most simplest scenario running.
Hi,
As such what I observe with one condition each for case 2a or 2b is that the value or forwarding vendor do not get updated to the conditions per se
In case of multiple conditions, I am not sure how it is going to identify the conditions (note indicates that it shall find as many conditions as supported in schema)
The surprising fact is that without the PO condition getting updated the freight value clearing account is getting hit on GR.
Regards
Biju Cherian
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.