Split criteria for invoices

[former_member338635]

Hello experts!

We have developped a split criteria for invoices: in case an invoice contains items with different VAT codes, the invoice will be split --> Result: one invoice per VAT code.

In the custo, you have assigned the split routine to the respective case(s):

Transaction VTFA: for Billing type / Sales order type / Item Category

Example:

For billing type ZF2 / Sales order type ZRTN / Item ZTAB: split criteria is assigned.

For billing type ZF2 / Sales order type ZRTN / Item ZAVA: split criteria is assigned.

Now we have the following problem:

We will invoice an item (ZTAB) with VAT Code G6 (20%) and corresponding down payments (ZAVA) with VAT Code V2 (0%).

Currently, invoice is split due to split criteria.

But this needs to be suppressed, as the down payments & the invoiced item have to be balanced/displayed on the same invoice.

Approach:

--> remove the split criteria from ZAVA item in the custo - Result: split still active as the ZTAB item is still customized with the split routine !? 
--> remove the split criteria from ZAVA item & ZTAB item in the custo - Result: would be OK, but the split is inactive also if we invoice > 1 ZTAB item with different VAT codes. So not accepted.

--> DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW THIS CAN BE MANAGED ???

(should be somehow feasible by SAP standart I guess)

Please advice!

Thanks a lot for your help!

TIM

[former_member182708]

Hi Tim,

in your previous thread I explained to you that a split based on tax code is not possible, simply since those tax codes are determined and assigned into the conditions later, when function PRICING is executed, and these are not yet known when the split is decided.

You did not show your split routine, but I suppose - according your description - the logic is linked not to the unknown tax code, but instead to the item category. Appearantly you know with which item category later which tax codes may appear, right?

But how do you expect here assistance? You would have to show your custom-own logic first. What is different in the split routines between the item categories? Is only the item category decsive?

Also it would be interesting to know what is behind this requirement? Why does this make sense what you are doing? Why should a split occur?

Best regards,

Tobias