on 05-28-2015 6:04 PM
Hi,
We would like to peg existing components supply without creating new procurement proposals.
We have achieved it for finished products by turning off source of supply in CTM profile (Exclude procurement alternatives in CTM profile).
We would like to do the same for components once PDS is exploded.
Once existing supply is pegged, may be in another run we would like to plan components for unmet demands for finished products.
Can it be possible through CTM or PPDS Heuristics without changing master data setting of components , please suggest.
Thanks!
Hi Manish,
In the CTM Profile, tab Special Strategies, at Net Change Planning section you have the options:
Specifies how the system handles previously created receipts, when CTM replans the demands.
Choose one of the following settings:
CTM planning can use the available receipts during replanning to fulfill demands.
CTM planning deletes available receipts that were linked via pegging relationships to demands that were deleted. Receipts that were linked to demands via dynamic pegging relationships, remain.
Only use this setting in connection with Fixed Pegging
CTM planning deletes all available receipts that are not linked to demands via pegging relationships.
Choose option - Do not delete available receipts
Then for the demand without receipts, in the Planning Strategy you can choose planning mode Orders Without Pegging and for delete mode - Do not Delete any orders.
Thanks,
Regards, Marius
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Manish,
CTM or PPDS will always create new supplies (receipts) for components if you have shortage!
You can try to delete the new created supplies (receipts) in another supplementary step.
For this choose tab Settings - Basic Data - and select End planning Run after order Selection with option Do not delete Pegging of Firm Orders (which were created in the precedent step).
Thanks, Marius
As standard, the system automatically deletes fixed pegging relationships when CTM planning deletes one of the relevant orders. The system only deletes fixed pegging relationships of two firm orders, however, if you have selected planning strategy Replan all Orders in the CTM profile. The system does not delete manually fixed pegging relationships between two firm orders.
If you set this indicator, the system will not delete fixed pegging relationships of two firm orders under any circumstances.
This setting improves the runtime of the order selection.
You can only use this setting when the system ends the planning run after deleting the orders.
Hi Manish,
I don't think your requirement is clear. If you don't want to create new supplies how would you create pegging between dependent demand of header with components. Example product A is header material which consumes B & C.
Demand for A is 1000 and stock is 200.
Stock for B is 300 & Firmed supply of 200
Stock of C is 700.
Could you elaborate what exactly you are looking for with this example?
Regards
Rahul
Hi Manish,
Yes they have fixed pegging but they are not firmed. You firm orders that you want to keep. The CTM will not delete the firmed orders with fixed pegging but it will delete the other orders even if they have fixed pegging.
Do not Delete Pegging Relationship of Firm Orders
Thanks, Marius
Hi Rahul,
In your above example i just want to satisfy demand for A which can be met with existing stocks or Firmed receipts.
So out of 800 remaining demand of A if we consider existing receipts only, 200 demand of A will be satisfied with existing supply of components and 600 will be unfulfilled.
I need this.
Thanks!
Hi Manish,
I am really not sure how you landed on 200 apart from stock. Basically you are saying you will not consider stock of B which is 300 & C 700. Why would you only consider firmed supply. This means business would not produce early with existing stock but would wait for firmed supply to translate into stock (example produciton order completion).
I think some thing is missing here.
On the other hand that existing firmed supply is for B but not for A. Could you check again.
Regards
Rahul
Hi Rahul,
Sorry i thought supply of B is only 200.
Yes system should take into account all 500 supply of B and then create new planned order for 500 qty of A, as B will constrained the plan of A.
Demand of 300 qty of A will be unfulfilled in this run.
System should not buy additional qty of B, just use the existing supply.
Hope this is clear.
Thanks!
Hi Manish,
You have to extract the pegging relationships and then decide what you firm. You can find more details in the forum.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/2144515
Thanks,
Regards, Marius
Hi Manish,
Check supply consumption functionality, let me know the results.
Though what would you do for remaining forecast?
Regards
Rahul
Hi Manish,
Pegging would anyways happen if you have sufficient demand. Example Material A is header (in-house), consuming B (in-house) & C (outsourced). Now if you have stock of A, B & C first any run would consider firmed supplies then to create new ones (until unless you exclude them).
So Demand for A 1000, and
Stock for A 400
Stock for B 300
Stock for C 700
In this case when you run CTM it would create pegging between all and new supplies would be 600, 700 & 300 for A, B & C. Obviously it would consider stock first though pegging type depends upon your business need.
I hope this is what you are looking for. Else let me know if your scenario is different.
Regards
Rahul
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Manish,
In CTM what you can do is define Order Selection (/SAPAPO/CTMORDSEL) containing all supplies except AG & AI.
Then assign this to CTM profile under planning scope tab - supply selection - order selection.
This will not create new supplies and would consume all firmed supplies example stocks, firmed planned order, production orders etc.
I hope this will resolve your issue else let me know otherwise.
Regards
Rahul
User | Count |
---|---|
7 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.