on 05-13-2015 9:03 AM
Hi Gurus,
I have one issue in pricing condition records(VK11). User maintained the condition records with three different dates like below.
Valid from Valid to Amount
05/13/2014 04/02/2015 24.50
04/03/2015 04/30/2015 24.50
05/01/2015 12/31/9999 24.50.
As per the above details those records has not interlinked with other records. All are individual. But after saving these records it has updates in table "A559" like below.
V | ZG10 | NL01 | 1205468 | 25010-PWR | 04/02/2015 | 05/13/2014 | 0052147684 |
V | ZG10 | NL01 | 1205468 | 25010-PWR | 04/30/2015 | 04/03/2015 | 0062540462 |
V | ZG10 | NL01 | 1205468 | 25010-PWR | 12/31/9999 | 05/01/2015 | 0052147684 |
Here the 1st and 3rd condition record has the same condition record number "0052147684".
Could you please let me know why is has happened like this.
Note: In VK11 1st and 3rd condition records are in Green color and 2nd condition record is in Black color. Please explain it what could be the reason behind this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Venkatakiran Boru.
Hi Kumar,
Are you sure you created condition records with same amount (24.50) for 3 difference periods?
It doesn't make sense.
The only possibility that duplicated KNUMH occurs in standard system is described in note 66943.
This means you first created a condition record with amount 24.50 from 05/13/2014 to 31/12/9999.
Then you inserted a condition record with a different amount 25.00 from 04/03/2015 to 04/31/2015.
In this case, the first and third condition record have the same number. This is standard behavior.
Best regards,
Tao
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Kiran,
by using T.Code VK11 and maintain condition record thrice and every time system generate different ConditionRecond No.
Find below records maintained in my system.
PR00 | 1000 | 10 | 60001304 | 15.05.2015 | 13.05.2015 | 0000402948 | ||
PR00 | 1000 | 10 | 60001304 | 20.05.2015 | 16.05.2015 | 0000402949 | ||
PR00 | 1000 | 10 | 60001304 | 25.05.2015 | 22.05.2015 | 0000402950 | ||
PR00 | 1000 | 10 | 60001304 | 31.12.9999 | 26.05.2015 | 0000402951 |
It is very strange how you maintain condition record so that system give you same number?
If your maintenance of condition record process is correct still getting same issue please raise OSS message to SAP.
Regards
Arun
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
What do you mean green color and black color in VK11? Could you please show that screen? Also update what have you maintained in access sequence for exclusive indicator field?
Thank$
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Navaneetha,
Thank you for your reply.
As per your instructions i have checked in KONH table and i found only two entries.
52147684 | EKAPITEI | 13.05.2014 | A | 559 | V | ZG10 | NL01000120546825010-PWR | 13.05.2014 | 31.12.9999 |
62540462 | MXS0913 | 03.04.2015 | A | 559 | V | ZG10 | NL01000120546825010-PWR | 03.04.2015 | 30.04.2015 |
Here in the above data the system mixed the 1st and last record and updated in single line. But no one record has deleted.
Regards,
Venkatakiran boru.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.