After post into 911 stroage type mateial don't get cosume

[sb_er]

Here requirement is

While do the GRN, material directly need to consume to cost center without coming to stock. For this cross docking process I done follow settings.

1)      I Tick pre-allocated stock to be considered in 101 mvt type.

2)      I maintained in table through LT51

3)      Done GRN, TO created and confirmed (LT06).

4)      Now material is available 911 storage type and the cost center BIN.

But here doubt is, if confirm the TO, material have to consume. Should not show in stock. But it shows the stock in consumption storage type and bin. If go in TO detail that show +sign of material quantity. Actually need to show – sign then only stock would get consume. How to overcome this problem.?

Regards

Karan

[MANIS]

For consumption against the cost center you are suppose to execute the MIGO transaction which will consume the stock from 911 now in the above case i don't see that you executed the same.

How do you expect the system to consume that. In standard SAP we don't have any configuration which will auto trigger the Consumption against Cost center after Goods receipt (GRN),  if you want to do that then you have to write your own logic as a custom code and provide the required input(material, quantity, movement type, batch) to the system for processing

[sb_er]

hi Manish kumar

thanks for your reply.

Normal scenario

1) i do GR, TO gets generate and confirm

2) stock is available in Bin

3) issue the goods to cost center. stock gets consumed. no stock in bin now

the above same is done by cross dock as follow

1)     1)  I Tick pre-allocated stock to be considered in 101 mvt type.

2)      2) I maintained in table through LT51

3)      3) Done GRN, TO created and confirmed (LT06).

4) Now material is available 911 storage type and the cost center BIN

But here doubt is, if confirm the TO, material have to consume. Should not show in stock. But it shows the stock in consumption storage type and bin. If go in TO detail that show +sign of material quantity. Actually need to show – sign then only stock would get consume. How to overcome this problem.?

Regards

Karan

[MANIS]

if i understood correctly then your expectation is that upon confirmation of Putaway transfer order (Movement type 101) the consumption against Cost center (Movement type 201) should happen in the background.

by maintaining the stock using LT51, at the time of TO creation system perform the check of allocated stock and display a message if the material is pre allocated stock please have a look on the below mentioned standard SAP link

Stock Placement with Active Bypass - Warehouse Management Guide - SAP Library

with your above step could you please suggest where is the linkage in between movement type 101 and 201,

These two are separate process  (Putaway and Consumption against cost center) after putaway of the goods you are supposed to use the transaction MIGO / Goods Issue / Cost center to perform that posting

[Former Member]

Hi,

Since you are doing a 101 - Goods receipt system is posting a positive quant correctly in 911 storage type. As per the Cross docking process instead of the Interim GR Zone you are moving to the Cross Docking location (Bin - 911).

Now the consumption part is separate. You have to do a GI against the cost center separately which will issue the material from 911 storage type.

As per the standard cross docking process, when you receive the material, you directly move to the GI / Picking location and this needs to be followed by a picking step separately.

Hope its clear.

Thanks,

[sb_er]

thanks for your reply

Purpose of the cross dock is to avoide Instead to bring the material (101) into bin and to issue cost centre 201

here 3 process happening

1) GR material at interim storage 902

2) bring the material into BIN by TO create and confirm TO

3) issue the material cost centre MIGO. goods issue, TO creation and confirmation.

incase of cross docking

step 2 is need to get skip

1) GR material at interim storage 902

2) From 902 material should move ( by create TO and confirm the TO) to 911 Cost centre BIN ( and need get consume, should not show in stock that is what happening above 3 rd step).

This the the thing i understood from cross docking.is this possible..?

Regards

karan

.

[JL23]

You misunderstand the purpose of WM. It is to manage stocks in a warehouse. It is a subsystem to inventory management on a more detailed level. The movements are usually triggered in inventory management first and have to be done on a more detailed level (picking/putaway) inWM.

You try to use WM cross docking to replace a IM goods issue, that is not going to work.

Cross docking is meant basically to avoid a putaway into a bin and move it directly from the interim bin of the receipt to the interim bin of the goods issue. But from there it is not going to be consumed automatically.

You can order your material account assigned to cost center, this means that a goods receipt does not create any inventory and you do not touch WM at all. Actually the most lean version of cross docking .

[sb_er]

Thanks for your reply

As you said in cross dock

1)     1 Material move from interim storage area to goods issue storage area.

2)     2 Then material needs to issue from IM then TO create and confirm in WM.

Without cross dock

1 Material move from interim storage area to BIN.

2)    2 Goods issue from IM and TO creates and confirm in WM stock gets consumed

In both cases we follow 2 processes. What is the usage to go for cross docking?

Regards

karan

[JL23]

Usually after a goods receipt in IM

you get a quant in 902 storage type

and your 1st activity is to move this quant into its final bin destination with a WM-TO

Then someone consumes the material to a cost center

you again get a quant in a interim storage type

and your 2nd activity is to pick this quant from its bin and to move it to the interim storage type

In cross docking you do not need to putaway the receipt to the bin and you do not need to pick the quant from its bin, you directly move it between the 2 interim storage types.

So you actually replace 2 activities (putaway and picking) with 1 activity (cross docking)

As you see, there is no saving on MIGO and MM movements.

Cross docking makes sense if you order to stock and while the order is in process by the vendor you get a request for a goods issue. So you are using cross docking to do a short cut.

[sb_er]

Thanks for your reply

Once if material comes to goods issue storage area rom GR area. if the material gets issue for cost centre in IM, for that TR number would get generate, by refer TR or Material  Docu Num in WM need to create TO or not?

if NO why?

Regards

karan

[Former Member]

Hi,

Yes. You need to generate TO with ref to the material document or TR and based on which material shall be moved from the source bin to the 911 storage type (interim for cost center).

Normally when you a GI against Cost Center in IM - Negative quant will be posted in 911 and finally it gets cleared when the TO is created and confirmed.

Thanks,

Ram

[sb_er]

Hi thanks for your reply

Normally when GI against Cost Center in IM - Negative quant will be posted in 911 and finally it gets cleared when the TO is created and confirmed. yes it is ok

If go for cross dock + qty will be at 911. while do good issue by refer cost centre in IM that qty will be cleared. But what about the material document and TR. that TR will be open. how to overcome that.

Regards

karan

[Former Member]

HI,

If not required, you can mark the TR as complete/processed.

Thanks,

[Former Member]

For material that is consumed for cost center during GR there should be no T.O. creation (if I understand your scenario). T.O. creation is the WM level movement to bring the stock out of the interim storage area after GR of stock item. Material that is directly consumed should not be posted to WM level at all (it should not appear in the interim storage type after GR). The material should be received with no positive quant in WM level.

It sounds like you are posting a goods receipt and expecting a goods issue ?

Is the intention to post a GR and have the stock automatically consumed (without any WM level quant being created) or is it to post a goods issue of existing stock?

[sb_er]

This message was moderated.