on 02-10-2015 9:36 AM
Dear All,
I am trying to do Consolidation on Proportionate method at 50%.
I have configured required business rules, script logic and Currency conversion as well.
I have created a separate Audit_Trail for the Proportionate Method of consolidation.
My problem is when I run the consolidation, it's running successfully and showing the records eliminated. how ever what ever the portion for the proportionate is not shown in the Audit trail member : AJ_PROP
please advise me.
Regards,
MS Rao
Hi,
Have you maintained datasrc_type = A and in business rule have maintained destination data source as AJ_PROP?
Please share screen shots of business rule.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Rao,
"Cant understand elimination happening and not moving to AJ_PROP data source"
You have to define method based multiplier what is entity method, what is interco method what is all formula and group formula. In the elimination and adjustment rule you have to enter what source audit ID you are going to consider for consolidation. It can be leaf or node source audit ID.
Attaching propionate method rules for your reference.
Hello Arnold,
Any Idea ... of my problem.
I have configured same as 440 proportionate method...but it's doing correctly.
1. Eliminated value should move to data source (AJ_PROP)
2. Cash account is not eliminating ...but currency conversion is happening correctly
3. Share Capital and Investment in Subsidiary portion not moving to AJ_PROP, how ever it's eliminating fully investment in sub.
Please suggest me...
Hi,
we have proportional consolidation in our system.
We have a method of type P (code 50).
We have a method based multiplicator of type P. The details are entity method 50, intco method 99, all formula PCON.
In the ownership model, the proportional companies have been given method 50 with a consolidation percentage (PCON) of 50%, though we have tried other percentages and they did work as well.
We then have a rule like the one in your screenshots, the difference being that we have specified a source audit id. In our case we use an audit id called INPUT which is of type I. This rule has no details.
The result is that 50% of the amount reported on each account are eliminated on the target audit id.
BR,
Arnold
User | Count |
---|---|
12 | |
3 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.