No down payments in COSP, COSS table

[Former Member]

Hello.

After using F-48 transaction to proceed down payments for WBS no actual cost are shown in COSP table. What can be the reason?

Already tried these things:

• Default cost element is defined in OKEP.
• In reports i alway tick the checkbox related to Vule type - 12 Down payments as costs. Still no costs
• After F-48 is executed no COSP table update is held.

We tried this function before with the same WBS and the same steps in creating down payments, so we are really confused why it is going that way. Any reply would be helpful.

[varshal_kachole3 · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Please refer to the SAP note http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/388843.

Please confirm that the Modification mentioned in the above note is not present in your system.

Hope it Helps!

Thanks and Regards,

Varshal Kachole

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

IN SFW1 it says "Object GD_DOWNPAYM_PR not found". May it be the problem?

[varshal_kachole3 · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Go to program LKAIPF1G line 242/ LKAIPTD6 line 27.

Hope it Helps!

Thanks and Regards,

Varshal Kachole

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Note is implemented but in SFW1 no such of switches exist...

242 line;

* Down payment active for at least one object category?

   IF GD_DOWNPAYM_OR = 'X' OR

      GD_DOWNPAYM_PR = 'X' OR

      GD_DOWNPAYM_VB = 'X' OR

      GD_DOWNPAYM_NP = 'X' OR

      GD_DOWNPAYM_RE = 'X'.

     cb_down_payment = 'X'.

   ENDIF.

[Paulo_Vitoriano · Accepted solution]

What is the master program to run the switch setup?

Anyway I do not understand digging into ABAP, if by default all switched must be active.

[varshal_kachole3 · Accepted solution]

Hi,

This note Does not mention the Business function Switch but a switch in the way the downpayments are handled in CO.

Did you also review LKAIPTD6 line 27?

Hope it Helps!

Thanks and Regards,

Varshal Kachole

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

   GD_DOWNPAYM_PR LIKE BOOLE-BOOLE VALUE 'X',            "or ' '

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Don't know. May be the problem that those switches doesn't exist in system, although the note is implemented

[Paulo_Vitoriano · Accepted solution]

Do not think it is possible to run a program with not defined global variables, must goto into a dump.  If the program is Active everything is defined.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Any other ideas? really strange that even the mistake doesn't occur while posting...

[Paulo_Vitoriano · Accepted solution]

Can you check (ask Basis) when the Note was applied to eliminate hopefully this version?

[varshal_kachole3 · Accepted solution]

Hi,

This proves the modification mentioned in the Note is absent in your case. So the code is not modified.

Can you confirm the Downpayment entries exists in table RPSCO with value type 12 please?

Thanks and Regards,

Varshal Kachole

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Yes, some down payments have been posted before these problem occured. Think nothing to do with this switches...

[Paulo_Vitoriano · Accepted solution]

Ne gusto... How about finding those FI documents and to check Special G/L indicator (just in case)?

Cost element is category 1 and being valid?

AuC asset class customizing has not been changed for account determination?

[varshal_kachole3 · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Please confirm the Cost Elements updated in OKEP is available in KA03 for a valid date range.

Thanks and Regards,

Varshal Kachole

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Aga, voobshe...
Yes, cost element is 1 - Primary costs.
G/L indicator is OK.
Now it's nothing to do with AuC asset class i think, such problem can occur only when the setlement is held and costs are on WBS. But we don't have down payments costs on WBS so far.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Yes. In OKEP CE is T309999999 and is active until 31.12.9999

[varshal_kachole3 · Accepted solution]

Hi,

I would take a step back and check the document posted with F-48. And Compare the transaction steps screen by screen with the one which posted it correctly previously.

Thanks and Regards,

Varshal Kachole

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

As i mentioned before. We repeat the same steps and even the same sums. did this many times.

[Paulo_Vitoriano · Accepted solution]

Zasada!  Sorry this is not helpful, but just to show where "switches" are defined, just as variables.

[varshal_kachole3 · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Please confirm that the downpayments are reflecting in the FI table BSIK.

Thanks and Regards,

Varshal Kachole

[kenmelching]

Try running OKGB - Reconstruct Down Payments

[Paulo_Vitoriano]

OKBG

[Former Member]

Useless, empty results for FI document

[Paulo_Vitoriano]

I know it is not a great option, but still can be faster then SAP Support saying that this is consulting... You can ask ABAPer to set some break points and debug to see where/why CO document is not created.

[Former Member]

Hi Kir,

Please confirm if you were able to see downpayment in CJI3 after selecting value type as  12

If not , in CJI3 report output layout, include column value type and filter it to show entries for Value type 61.

Check once if you are able to see entries there.

Regards

Tushar

[Former Member]

As we already know it's CO document creation while down payments posting problem.
Nothing to do with value type.

[Paulo_Vitoriano]

Hello,

As a starting point, when you display FI document, can you get with relationship browser to the associated Controlling document?

Do you have a WBS in the Financial document?

Have you searched OSS with OKEP?

I also got this note from documentation:

The system updates only actual down payments for settlement to assets under construction. It is not possible to trace all down payment postings from Financial Accounting to Controlling.

Meanwhile not sure if it is valid any more or if dependent on version and EhP level.

Regards,

[Former Member]

Hello, Paulo.

Yes, the problem is CO document doesn't creates when i post down payments in F-48. It was okay month ago... What can be the reason?

[Paulo_Vitoriano]

Hello,

There must have been some changes in the mean time...  try thinking about it.

Does the WBS linked to the AuC?  Is it the same WBS where down payment was creating the CO document before?

Thank you,

[Former Member]

The wbs is linked to AUC. We also tried this procedure with WBS that have down pawments, that were proceed succesfully before.

Gonna try the switches mentioned in http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/388843.