01-26-2015 1:01 PM
Hello,
I would like to know if the same autorization object we use in Purchase order releases - M_BEST_WRK - can be used to separate the Service Entry Sheet releases by Plant? Or do we have to use antoher autorization object to asure that the service manager from plant 1 can not release the SES belonging to plant 2?
Thanks for any reply.
Aart
01-28-2015 8:11 AM
Meh. A short look at SU24 with TCode ML85 could have shown you that, yes, in ML85 M_BEST_WRK is an object that will be checked.
If you release SES coming from ML81N - same checks.
Different for ML81 (and doesn't work properly, either), which is why one shouldn't use this "old" transaction anymore. It IS useful for old batch-inputs, though (if you still have those).
01-26-2015 4:12 PM
01-26-2015 5:22 PM
Thanks,
But I need to know if the same authorization object can be used with trx. ML85 (SES release) to separate SES from different plants.
Or does one has to use another authorization object?
Bye
Aart
01-26-2015 9:47 PM
Hi,
isn't the easiest option to run authorization trace ST01 on ML85 and see what is being check during SES approval? You could get another a hint from looking at authorization defaults in SU24 for ML85.
Cheers
01-28-2015 8:11 AM
Meh. A short look at SU24 with TCode ML85 could have shown you that, yes, in ML85 M_BEST_WRK is an object that will be checked.
If you release SES coming from ML81N - same checks.
Different for ML81 (and doesn't work properly, either), which is why one shouldn't use this "old" transaction anymore. It IS useful for old batch-inputs, though (if you still have those).