cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

S_ALR_87013545 Project Actual Costs show incorrect figure

former_member355038
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi,

I have scenario where the posted figure for work centre does not match the activity type figure(KP26) for example

In S_ALR_87013545 report there is a posted figure of £1680 to a network when I drill-down into the figure I can see the network confirmation with 7 hours booked using activity ADMIN from the work centre I can see the cost centre of ADMIN.

Using KP26 I can see the rate of £40. Therefore I would have a posting of £280 (7*40) not £1680, does anyone know why I would have this posting? I have checked KP26 on the change log and there have not been any recent changes to the rates.

I would add that the incorrect figures are only for 1 employee, others link to the same work centre and activity type and they are posting correctly - ie the correct rate of £40 is used.

thanks

Joe

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

former_member355038
Participant
0 Kudos

Issue resolved - incorrect figures maintained in the period screen of KP26

thanks for all your help.

Answers (4)

Answers (4)

varshal_kachole3
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

Would you be able to differentiate the postings in CJI3 for Business Transaction RKL and RKLN or table RPSCO with budget type RKL and RKLN.

Please ensure that CJN1/CJN2 is not executed in your system.

Hope it Helps!

Thanks and Regards,

Varshal Kachole

former_member195427
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Joe,

You can run CJEN followed by CJBN to reconstruct project info database and remove any report inconsistencies.

Apart from that, can you please share pricing screen (KP26) where you maintained this rate and the t-code screen where you posted this actual data to project wbs.

Thanks

Saurabh

former_member355038
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi,

I have run CJEN and CJBN not difference to the report, KP26 entries:

thanks

Joe

MTerence
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Joe,

Is there any cancellation occurred ? We have a inconsistency note for cancellation of documents.

Also go to CJI3 and check with respect to posting dates, see whether it matches with your CAT2 entry.

Regards

Terence

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Joe,

Can you please run transaction CJEN to correct this?

If this does not correct this, can you please check the value category

customizing according to the following settings:


1) In transaction CJVC, all yellow and/or red lights have to eliminated
   by assigning each cost element/commitment item/statistical key figure
   according to the following rules:


   1.1) Each cost element/commitment item/statistical key figure should
        be assigned to a value category, EVEN if its values should NOT
        be updated to table Project Information Database, table RPSCO.
        In this case please create an assignment to a value category
        and activate its 'suppress' indicator. All values basing on an
        assignment to this value category won't be updated to RPSCO.


   1.2) Each cost element/commitment item/stat. key figure has to be
        assigned exactly once to a value category. Assigning them to
        more or less than one value category will lead to unpredictable
        results.


   1.3) Only
        1.3.1) cost elements of the same cost element type,
        1.3.2) commitment items of the same item category and
        1.3.3) statistical key figures of the same unit of measure
               and the same KF category
        are allowed to be assigned to one value category. Mixed assignments

        will lead to unpredictable results, like mixing costs and revenues in

        columns or rows.


2) If all yellow and/or red lights in transaction CJVC are eliminated,
    please rebuild the Project Information Database (table RPSCO) by
    transaction CJEN. Without this, changes from 1.1)-1.3) won't have
    any effect.


3) Please rebuild the assigned values by transaction CJBN.

BR,

Enrique