on 01-23-2015 7:33 AM
we want to have performa invoice and F2 invoice with same number, but our performa invoice and F2 invoice is not raising at the same day, is it possible?
for example, Jan.22 after picking, we raise a performa invoice, invoice number is PI12345. in Jan.25, we do PGI and genarate F2 invoice 12345, accounting document number also 12345, how to? thanks
is it possible?
First try in your system and update here whether your query is answered or not. For these type of queries, it would be good if you put some efforts on your own, test in your system, so that you will come to know how SAP is functioning.
Coming to your requirement, practically there are more disadvantages in going with the same object. System will allow you to create en-number of proformas whereas, it will not allow in case of commercial invoice. Just assume, if user generates multiple proformas before generating a commercial invoice, which proforma reference, system should consider. The same way, you also need to take into consideration cancellation of commercial invoices. Of course, you can have the same accounting document reference as that of commercial invoice.
G. Lakshmipathi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
it is not able to copy performa invoice number to commercial invoice number range
If you know how system is fetching the billing document number range, you would not have posted this. You have to maintain the same object in VOFA for both billing types. Also, what will happen if user creates proforma for two different customers simultaneously. Let us assume, for both document types, number range starts from 1234. Now for Customer ABC, the first proforma reference is 1234 and for another customer DEF, the subsequent proforma reference is 5678. Now if user generates billing document for customer DEF, ideally, system would consider 1234 only and NOT 5678. For this, you need to go for billing exit USEREXIT_NUMBER_RANGE_INV_DATE in program RV60AFZC where you need to validate
but again, this practice definitely, should not be encouraged.
G. Lakshmipathi
User | Count |
---|---|
110 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.