on 01-21-2015 11:47 AM
Hi,
In a HA[High availability] architecture , whether the 2nd node will also be active or it will be passive? ie is it like a oracle RAC configuration whether both the nodes are active?
Regards,
Sam
Oracle RAC is a shared disk cluster, so multiple RAC instances can access data on the same disk.
SAP HANA scale-out (with one master and one or more slaves) is a shared nothing cluster of active nodes, every node accesses its own set of data on disk.
SAP HANA standby nodes are passive, but they are able to step in if one master or slave node fails. Then they can access the data previously used by the failing master or slave.
SAP HANA system replication is comparable to Oracle dataguard, so it is a kind of standby database with an independent persistence.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The type of storage doesn't matter here, it's a shared nothing approach. You can compare it to Oracle Parallel Server (which was there before Oracle RAC). If one master or slave fails, there are mechanisms that the set of disks is remapped to the standby node. But at any time only one node accesses a certain storage area.
The replication side is supposed to take over the production load if the primary side goes down. So it is in most cases not really acceptable to configure a smaller replication side. The SAP HANA how-to guide for system replication provides further details including: "The number of nodes in the secondary system has to be equal to the number of active nodes in the primary system."
A single standby node can take over the work of any failed master or slave node assigned to it.
Hopefully final set of questions ...
1. In a Single Node architecture(scale-up), if I have a HA Standby Node within the same DC(without data replication, whether I can run my DEV or QA systems in the standby Node?,[during failover shutdown DEV & QA].
2. Hope is a Standby Database in DC2[DR], we can run DEV/QA systems[shutdown DEV/QA during disaster]
3. Whether its mandatory to have the same configuration as that of the Production for the Standby Node[Failover-DC1} and Standby Database[DR-DC2]. or it can be of a lesser configuration.
4.Practically for Business suite solution whether Single Node architecture [scale up] and for BW Multi Node[scale out] architecture is used?
5.For a multi node architecture for a BI/ERP system in primary site, whether the failover/DR for that can be a single node?
Regards,
Sam
1. No
2. Yes
3. Standby node: same configuration, system replication: configuration can differ (e.g. smaller global allocation limit on replication side)
4. BW typically has higher data volumes and takes more advantage of scale-out compared to Suite on HANA.
5. System Replication will always fail over the whole set of nodes and not only a single node.
User | Count |
---|---|
80 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.