why mb90 dosen't work with other language ??

[former_member328595]

hi every body

our language is persian . end users for print Repeat used mb90 . 2 weeks age they can't do print . they have NDR parameter

but when I change the default of date to EN  it is possible .look at these :

error message : no message for repeat processing exist

when i change it to :

please guide me .what can i do???

[former_member328595]

the big problem is this. all of the end users changed their date format .

when the date format changed to iranian date , in the mb90 if I enter the 2014 or 1393 it dosen't work . just we must change the date format to DD.MM.YYYY , after that in mb90 enter the 2014 so it's work .

thank you any way for you guiding .

[JL23]

I would take this issue to SAP Support. for me it sounds like a bug or at least a gap in the design.

[former_member328595]

Dear Experts

we log on to sap with EN language but the format of date is persian .

look at this :

it's relevant to today that  convert to persian calender

we change the date format in su3

dose it relevant to any job or program ???may a program didn't execute???

[former_member201529]

Dear Khojaloo,

Have you tried to create new message output line in MB02 with Perisan language....?

Once output created execute MB90 with processing mode 1 and try...

Regards,

Karna J

[former_member328595]

Mr jurgen look at this document .

I take a report in NAST for persian language and I found this document :

but this document also in mb90 dosen't print .

[JL23]

are you logged in with English or with Persian language when it does not print?

Material document 4901416236 was created in English, you tried MB90 repeat print with Persian logon and it did not work, you change the language of the user to EN and it worked with a English login, right?

Material document 4901418356 was created in a different language than English (I dont know what this sign means), but the error you show is in an English screen.

So it is for me in general exact the same problem just the other way around.

Why do you create those original prints in language A and need  the repeat print in language B?

[former_member328595]

we didn't change the language . we changed the date format .

[JL23]

You confuse 2 fields: the date  and its format and the  year of the material document.

MB90 screen has only the year of the material document, it has no date.

Look how it is stored in the table:

[former_member328595]

when i change the date format , the information of MKPF displayed this way

system convert the date format , please look at this :

[JL23]

I did not say you have to change the date format, I just wanted to say that you have to enter 2014 in MB90 since this field is not maintained according to the persian calendar and has no conversion exit to display the year according to the Persian calendar.

The date is stored in any case the way SAP designed, you user settings just make it look different.

If you remove the flag for "use conversion exit" in the SE16 settings, then you would never see your Persian date in SE16 , no matter what setting your user profile has.

I don't know if that is by design that the document year is not converted or a bug. You may need to contact SAP for this.

[former_member328595]

exactly .

now what can I do that after this time they can print it with FA language . do i change the any setting???

[JL23]

Messages are stored in table NAST, table NAST has the language among the key fields.

if you want repeat an existing message, then it has to be done under the same conditions, with the same language

[former_member328595]

also in MN22 it was EN . I changed it to FA ( persian) . but still it dosen't work

[former_member328595]

please look at the top of the page .I said it work with format 2014

[former_member328595]

because of our date format :

here you are :

[Prasoon]

Hi,

   In MKPF, the doc year is 2014. Could you please test the scenario with year as 2014 in MB90

Regards,

AKPT

[Prasoon]

Hi,

   May I know why you used the material doc year as 1394 in the first case?.

   Could you please check it with year as the correct year (like 2014) from MKPF (MKPF-MJAHR) and test the scenario again.

Regards,

AKPT

[former_member328595]

before 2 weeks ago it work . but now it dosen't work