12-31-2014 6:33 AM
HI ABAP/BRF/BASIS expert,
We are trying to implement t note 1912092. But received the error CL_FDT_CC_SERVICES has syntax error. when I checked the error found that
interface IF_FDT_CONSTANTS_INTERNAl contais the error and FDT_AUTHFIELD_CATEGORY data element is missing .
Please anyone can help us that why this error or how we can remove this error.
Thanks
Rajeev
12-31-2014 6:46 AM
Have you carried out all manual pre and post implementation tasks? Not just of this note, but of all the prerequisite notes that went in at the same time?
Hint - if you want to find out which note hasn't been correctly applied, search in service.sap.com for the object in the error message. In this case, I simply searched for FDT_AUTHFIELD_CATEGORY and found out which note you're missing or hasn't been applied properly. I suggest you do the same.
Yes, I could just give you the note number, but if you find it yourself, then you'll better remember the process.
If you are ever in the situation where you can't find which note is missing, the next step is to open a service call with SAP. Sometimes they miss pre-requisites.
12-31-2014 6:46 AM
Have you carried out all manual pre and post implementation tasks? Not just of this note, but of all the prerequisite notes that went in at the same time?
Hint - if you want to find out which note hasn't been correctly applied, search in service.sap.com for the object in the error message. In this case, I simply searched for FDT_AUTHFIELD_CATEGORY and found out which note you're missing or hasn't been applied properly. I suggest you do the same.
Yes, I could just give you the note number, but if you find it yourself, then you'll better remember the process.
If you are ever in the situation where you can't find which note is missing, the next step is to open a service call with SAP. Sometimes they miss pre-requisites.
12-31-2014 7:48 AM
Thank you Matthew . I have checked the note in marketplace and found that Note number 1614091
is applicable for this . am I correct?
12-31-2014 10:27 AM
That's the one that has manual steps to create the missing object, yes.