My Timesheet error when we redefine odata service - "Property 'counter' which is a key cannot be set to nullable"

[Former Member]

Hello Everyone,

I need your suggestion regarding "My Timesheet" application of SAP Fiori (hcm_ts_cre).

1. In my ECC system, in transaction /SEGW, I open project SRA002_TIMESHEET.
2. I created a zproject.
3. In my zproject->Data Model->I redefine the odata service from SRA002_TIMESHEET.
4. The entries for "creatable, updatable,...etc" are automatically unchecked in my zproject.

Why does it happen?

Reference:

http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20dbf542-f3e7-3110-a6b8-ebb96b57c...

Scenario 2:

When I copy the SRA002_TIMESHEET project into another z project then try to redefine it in another project, it works fine.

Can someone explain me the reason behind this?

Best Regards,

Lipsa

[kammaje_cis · Accepted solution]

Lipsa,

I have the latest SP pack in my system for Timesheet. I see that even in the standard Project SRA002_TIMESHEET, all Entity sets have Creatable, editable, Deletable checkboxes unchecked. May be you can show a screenshot of what do you see.

regards

Krishna

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Krishna,

Even I have the latest pack SP 06 for My Timesheet app.

1. Screenshot for standard project "SRA002_TIMESHEET" , particularly for the TimeEntry EntityType:

2. Screenshot for zproject for the same EntityType: TimeEntry, after right clicking -> Data Model - > Redefine -> Odata Service (GW) and providing the standard project's service name: "SRA002_TIMESHEET_SRV":

Mark here:- All the creatable, updatable, sortable checked ones in the standard project, when redefined in another project,only have nullable checked and in read only mode.

Why does this happen?

Regards,

Lipsa

[pankaj_bisht · Accepted solution]

Hi Lipsa,

Please clear the model cache after implementing Sp06.

Then implement the latest version of the note 2087025.

That should solve the issue.

Best Regards

Pankaj

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Pankaj,

Thanks a lot !   Issue resolved.

After implementing the latest version of the note 2087025, it works perfectly fine.

Regards,

Lipsa