Rebate volume calculation based on payer, not only on sold-to party

[Former Member]

Hi,

I have created a rebate agreement (let's name it agreement A) based on a percentage condition of gross sales.

Agreement A has a unique condition triggered by an access sequence, containing several cases,
but only depending on SOLD-TO party.

Therefore, for all invoices based on a particular SOLD-TO partner (customer A),
my condition is determined and accrual is increased.

Then, I've created an other agreement (named agreement B).
This agreeement is based on a condition, triggered by an other SOLD-TO party (customer B).

But...when using VBO3 to drill-down agreement A, I have been very surprised
to see it contains entries for customer B.
Only reason is customer A is sometimes payer for sold-to B.
But my condition from agreement A is only triggered for SOLD-TO, not for PAYER.

As anyone ever see this ?
Why is SAP justifying drill-down base calculation on PAYER, whereas in customizing condition's access
is only driven by SOLD-TO ?

Thanks for your help,

Laurent.

[Former Member]

Hi,

what about when using VBO3 to drill-down agreement B, can you see it contains entries for customer A?

My guess is that, the same condition type and its access table (where sold-to is the access field) are used in agreement A and B

[neeraj_lal]

Check your sales document... from which rebate document condtion record is coming..

[anirban_pahari]

Dear Laurent,

Can you please provide the screen shots of drill down for both agreement A and B to help us analyse better. For your info rebate is triggered based on the Payer being rebate relevant or not.

Regards,
Anirban

[Former Member]

Hello Anirban,

Thank you for your question.

Please find here two screenshots.

1) Condition defined for rebate agreement,

where you can see my "A" customer = 32100490

(sold-to party on which I would like my condition to be based)

2) Drill down from my rebate agreement "A"

on which you can see there are different sold-to : 32100498 and 3202205 ...! I was not expecting to see some other sold-to, since my only condition is based on customer "32100490"

Therefore my base value for calculation is far too high, due to "unexpected" sold-to customer.

Many thanks,

LB