on 10-13-2014 10:34 AM
Hello,
i setup a MFS in SAP EWM 9.0. I have successfully configured a conveyor-system and now i want to put a HU away in storage. For the rack feeder i have a MFS-Queue (with active resource management). The according warehouse order is put in the right queue at the right time, but the resource does not automatically start to process the warehouse order.
I have reviewed all available documentation and i really don't see what i have missed. All masterdata and customizing entries are there, but nothing happens automated on this end. The transport via conveyor system works correctly and automated.
With best regards,
Patrick.
Hi Patrick
Check all your telegram is getting created and and you are getting conformation back to sap.
and use queue type resource with MFS.
check all structures used
Material Flow System (MFS) Telegram Processing Define Telegram Structure -> Define Telegram Structure for PLC
And
Material Flow System (MFS) Telegram Processing Define Telegram Structure -> Define Telegram Structure for PLC Interface Type
check all structure is working as expected.
Regards
Suraj
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Suraj,
we are currently using the FM "/scwm/mfs_sim_receive" for testing the telegram communication.
The problem we encounter is the fact, that the WHO is assigned to the correct queue of our mfs-resource, but the WHO will not be processed automatically. From my understanding this is not a problem in the telegram or plc data. In that case we at least would get a error message in the logs.
With best regards,
Patrick
Hi Alex,
the channels are up and running. Also the status is "B". It is possible to send telegrams manually. The problem is, that the queue of the resource does not trigger the processing of the WHO via the resource, which has open capacity. This doesnt seem to be a common problem and from our understanding the WT_DET-trigger for created/activitated/confirmed WTs is not working.
With best regards,
Patrick.
User | Count |
---|---|
8 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.