Get Confirmation number from a PO

[Former Member]

Hi All,

We have a requirement to fetch the Confirmation number/ item details for a Particular PO#/Item.

We have gone through several threads in SCN, where it was advised to use function module - BBP_PD_CONF_GETLIST by providing the PO number.

This lists all the confirmations for that PO header.

However we would like to find out the confirmation that a particular PO line item.

Is there a way in SRM to find this out? Please advise.

Thanks in advance! Regards, MS

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi All,

Thanks for your helpful replies. In the standard function module, even though there was a reset buffer in the beginning, the internal table GT_FOUND was not getting refreshed. We have added an implicit enhancement for this, and now it works. Hope this solution can be of help to others as well.

Cheers, Ms

[robin_janke]

Hi,

please use BBP_PD_PO_GETHISTORY with PO number and line item number. In the results you should see the confirmation.

Regards,

Robin

[Former Member]

Hello Robin,

Your reply was most helpful. However I have an issue with cache clearing with this function module.

I am running this FM in loop with several POs. I am clearing all the variables at the end of the loop.

LOOP AT...

MOVE <POnumber> TO ls_object_key-object_id.

MOVE <PO item no> TO ls_object_key-number_int.

       CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_PO_GETHISTORY'

         EXPORTING

           i_object_key = ls_object_key

         TABLES

           e_po_history = lt_po_history.

<operations performed with lt_po_history>

CLEAR: ls_object_key,

              lt_po_history.

ENDLOOP.

For the second loop, I get data relevant to the first loop as well. I debugged the function module and found that GT_FOUND[] table picks up the data from the previous loop as well. Have you faced this issue before?

Please advise.

Thanks, MS

[vinita_kasliwal]

Hi MS
Did you try LOOP AT. lt_table into LS_structure  ..

Should it not solve your issue .. and LS_structure can hold only 1 value so not sure

how it would have the value from the last loop 😕

Paste your exact code and maybe it would become more clear and what is missing ..

Regards

Vinita