Retaining original filename in FILE->SOAP->SOAP->FILE

[Former Member]

We have faced a scenario where I have to retain original filename in File-> SOAP-> SOAP ->File. The issue is that we don't have any ESR objects and neither do we intend to create any. So its purely configuration to transfer file from one folder to another.

Any suggestion would be highly appreciated.

Thanks,

Swati

[former_member181985]

Hi Swati,

I hope soap message is from one PI to another PI system. If yes, try these settings

1. in File sender channel, enable ASMA for FileName

2. in receiver soap channel select Keep Headers

3. in sender soap channel select Keep Headers

4. in File receiver channel, enable ASMA for FileName

Best Regards,

Praveen Gujjeti

[former_member541302]

Hello Swati,

Even after trying the above steps suggested by Praveen, if you don't get the results use Dynamic Configurations module in the Receiver channel along with the above settings.

1) Make sure the above settings are done (given by Praveen)

2) Assign a new variable as the file name parameter under receiver channel configurations.

3) Assign the "message:interface_name" value to the variable under Variable Substitution

4)Under Module Tab do the following:

Let me know if you still face any further issue.

Regards,

Simran

[former_member181985]

Hello Simran,

I am bit wondering why variable substitution is required, when FileName is being carried by Dynamic Header

Regards,

Praveen Gujjeti

[former_member541302]

Praveen: Even I find that odd, but the thing is if we user * instead of a variable the receiver channels throws an error for the "*" value not identified kind of.

[Former Member]

I tried, its not working..

[former_member181985]

Can you share MONI screen shots for Dynamic configuration (SOAP Header) for steps 1,2,3, 4

[Former Member]

the dynamic configuration for file name is not being transferred from SOAP-->SOAP

[former_member184720]

Did you check the below thread -

[Former Member]

yes I have checked it already, a number of solutions there involve udf and mapping. I can do neither since we are not making any message mapping.

[former_member184720]

Then AFAIK there is no standard way of doing it. .