Skip to Content

Archived discussions are read-only. Learn more about SAP Q&A

could you please help, in clarifying my view on Workflow(MSMP) in AC. I have mentioned below, my understanding.

-  Rule id is created on BRF+, and this Rule id contains Path(s) and their Rule Result(s).  I have created 1 Rule Result, for a New/Change account.

- after creating this Rule Id, i open MSMP, and the Rule Id appears against the Process Id, in Step1. I am not using any Escape path, so as to have my first workflow creation simple.

- In Step 2, the Rule ID is Result is given a Trigger value description. So, i provide a description, for my Rule Result.However could you please say, the usage of this Trigger value, except that, it proivdes Description of the Rule result

- then i go to Step 5 , for creating Path, Add a Path-> Add a stage (GRAC_SECURUTY). Since, this is for testing purpose, i am not giving GRAC_ROLEOWNER/GRAC_MANAGER. I just want a workflow to be completed for New/Chnage Account request.

- I do not maintain Agents or Variables & Templates.

- In route Mapping, I assig the Path to the Rule Id, Then i generate the version, and it is created succesfully.

So, from the above steps , i understand that When a user raises a New/Change Request(eg. process ID: SAP_GRAC_ACCESS_REQUEST), the Rule ID is identified , from Step1. Then the Rule result is identified from  Decision Table( in BRF+). Then the Rule Result identifies the path from Step 'Route mapping'. Aftre Path is identified, it travels through the Stages, defined in 'Maintain Path'

Therafter , the Security team or Role Owner can provison the request.

Please let me know, about my understanding.

Former Member
replied

Hi Plaban

I wrote a piece about explaining how MSMP works with the mappings. It might help clarify your understanding: MSMP - Multi Step Multi Process – GRC’s answer to Workflow Configuration Flexibility

When you submit a request each type has a Process Id. In the case of an Access Request that is the SAP_GRAC_ACCESS_REQUEST. The webdynpro has a heap of code that finds that process id and goes to look at the MSMP configuration.

The very first item to be executed is the Initiator rule. Each Process Id can only have one active Initiator Rule as it is mapped (visible on Step 1 of the MSMP). If you have created a BRF+ Initiator Rule then it will go and execute it. Initiator Rules are designed to handle multiple scenarios (hence the results).

In your BRF+ you would have specified the possible combinations (again look at my post). In MSMP Step 2 for the Initiator rule for Rule Results you need to tell the MSMP how to handle each value that the BRF+ rule might return. As a result, you have to map each value. The description won't matter much except as meaningful information.

After you finish Step 2, you then need to go over to Step 6 to maintain the routings. This is where you have to tell the MSMP which Path the rule result should go to for the Initiator Rule. After that you jump back to Stage 4 for Paths/Stages to maintain them.

This mapping assumes that you are not building any new Agents or Paths. If you were to build a new Path and Stages you would have to configure them first and then go to Step 6 to map them

Please let me know if there is still any further confusion.

Regards

Colleen

0 View this answer in context
Not what you were looking for? View more on this topic or Ask a question