on 09-10-2014 8:35 AM
Hi experts,
We have a client scenario whose wants to see the report in a daily basis.
Unfortunately, the report consists of those data from a standard extractor named 0FI_GL_14 which involve with really huge SAP tables such as FAGLFLEXA.
The current BW system (SAP BW 7.01) schedules a daily job for this extraction daily and it takes approximately around 12 - 16 hours for daily data load. Yes, the table is really huge and there are approximately more than 300 million records reside in the table.
Therefore, we cannot leverage this daily data to be reported in time and would like to improve extraction performance.
We are considering two options to resolve this matter.
Would you please have any suggestion or advise in regard to this? We would like to get back to the client to recommend with the better solution.
Thanks in advance.
Ps. Figure attached is a current configuration for the mentioned table.
Few points to consider:
Do this with indexing and this will help (as GL line items extraction needs extra care)
Cheers,
Suyash
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Harish & Ramanjaneyulu
Thanks for your prompt response.
Do you know whether there is any issue in terms of existing reports performance? Functional users has raised the issues that they have once in a while created secondary indices and it turned out that their existing reports which used another index executed slower.
Thanks again!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
in our case it won't disturb as i guess.
For our data source table we will create index on timestamp field.
That is specially for BW Extraction purpose. to know this, please check ecc table FAGLFLEXA-->display -> click on tool bar - index icon and see there.
You can apply at dev environment and see the performance.
if there is no impact of existing reports then that would be good to go ahead.
I don't think because of index creation your reports performance will not impact, it might be some other issue!!!
Please go ahead with index creation as i said earlier you've to create indexes both App server level & even same things needs to be done DB level then only you can achieve result... make sure of thorough testing in quality before moving this changes to prod environment.
Thanks & Regards,
Harish
Hi,
Adding new index will not affect other report directly.
But it may affect other report indirectly as there are some new stuff for database optimizer to consider and the decision may change and lead to slow performance.
But I don't think it is a common case, and it is more likely the statistics is not update and/or not enough, which is a database admin issue.
So, make sure you rebuild the statistics for the tables you created the new index then you should be fine.
Regards
Bill
Hi Raman,
We also having performance issue with 0FI_GL_14 and we have sap defined index 7 for timestamp for the table table FAGLFLEXA but it index is missing for all database system(option). So now I want create new index with same field combination as index 7( given by sap) and select as index on all database systems. Is this is a correct way to proceed?
Thanks
Vinod
Hi Thanoo,
2nd option was useful.
You will create index at ECC side on data source base tables.
So in such case it won't disturb any of your reports.
But better to take downtime or handle this case at weekends or where 0 business hours.
Mean while please refer SAP Note 1397864 .
Thanks
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Please go for 2nd options i.e. creation of secondary indexes on the base tables.
with this you can except some sort of performance improvement in the data extraction.
when comes to downtime yes you've to create indexes on App & DB server level on weekends so that you'll have zero impact on business postings.
Thanks & Regards,
Harish
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
86 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.