cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Credit limit partly used but credit block applied

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello,

in FD 32 for sold to party, the credit limit used is just 40% but in sales order, we still get the credit block !

1) what is the reason for the same ? How should this be analysed or corrected ?

2) Is it possible that credit limit is partly used but we still get the credit block on sales order based on other credit checks settings like "maximum" document value reached, critical field check etc (all these defined in automatic credit control in OVA8 T code )

regards

Pamela

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (3)

Answers (3)

venu_ch8
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Dear Pamela


1) what is the reason for the same ? How should this be analysed or corrected ?

CHECK_CM

You can understand why this document is blocked , what is the reason


2) Is it possible that credit limit is partly used but we still get the credit block on sales order based on other credit checks settings like "maximum" document value reached, critical field check etc (all these defined in automatic credit control in OVA8 T code )

Please look in to Google once before asking such a basic questions

Thanks a lot

former_member220617
Contributor
0 Kudos

Dear Pamela,

kindly check the below settings in OVA8 weather you activated number of days consider for open items or not ?

Regards,

srinu_s1
Active Contributor
0 Kudos
in FD 32 for sold to party, the credit limit used is just 40% but in sales order, we still get the credit block !

Please note we usually maintain the credit limit for Payer not for Sold to party in FD32,Even though 40% is used, still system block the document subject to if any of the checks are activated in OVA8 and documents meet the those checks, then system block document irrespective of credit limit availbility.

1. Critical fields

2. open items

3. Oldest open items etc. Please read this functionality once again and i hope your 2nd question also is answered with the above.

Please note this is already discussed many times.

thanks,

Srinu.