cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

ITAB_STRUC_ACCESS_VIOLATION in tcode CJ20n

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Friends,

After upgrade the kernel version from 701 to 721, we are getting short dump error in transaction CJ20N when going for save the data. The program name is SAPLCNPB_M.

We have get the abap dump error message - ITAB_STRUC_ACCESS_VIOLATION.

Before kernel upgrade we did not get any above message.

Please suggest for solution

Regards,

Ajay Asawa

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Friends,

After implement the note  1623745, its work fine.

Thanks to all.

Regards,

Ajay Asawa

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

former_member188883
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Ajay,

If it is problem with only one tcode check with regenerating the program.

Else attach full abap dump and share the details under which step you get this dump.

Regards,

Deepak Kori

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Friends,

System environment:-

   SAP-Release 701 SP 0013

   SAP kernel....... 721 Patch level. 201

   Database version. "OCI_102, 10.2.0.4.0, V3

   Operating system..... "HP-UX"

Release.............. "B.11.31"

  

  

We have run the tcode CJ20n and then open the project definition.

After open the project definition then go to EDIT - Status - Completely Technically -SET (Status was set)

Then when we try to saving we get the ABAP dump message.

Here attached the abap dump image.

Regards,

Ajay Asawa

divyanshu_srivastava3
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Ajay,

I believe there are issues with compatibility of kernel and how you have updated your kernel.

Read this as a start point and refer additional notes linked to this as per your OS and Release : 1716826 - Usage of the downward compatible kernel 721 (EXT)


Regards,

Divyanshu

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Divyanshu,

But we have upgraded the our kernel version before six month in our landscape and systems also working fine after kernel upgrade.

CJ20n - transaction are used very rarely for completed the project status. In march its was working.

Now user get the abap dump this time.

Please help for how to correct the issue

Regards,

Ajay Asawa

divyanshu_srivastava3
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Ajay,

If this is the case, please zip and upload the full dump.

Also, is this for a single user or for everyone ?

Regards

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Divyanshu,

Thanks for message. Problem is everyone like BASIS user ID too.

But only for this tcode CJ20N.

How to attach zip file here?

Regards,

Ajay

former_member188883
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Ajay,

For 721 kernel latest patch is 300. Please try with this and check the results.

Regards,

Deepak Kori

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Deepak,

As u suggest I will try to update patch level on test system and update you.

Regards,

Ajay Asawa

divyanshu_srivastava3
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Ajay,

What is your system release and can you share the full dump ?

Regards,

Divyanshu

divyanshu_srivastava3
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Mean while, check 1295973 - Runtime error ITAB_STRUC_ACCESS_VIOLATION


Regards,

Divyanshu

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello,

System environment

   SAP-Release 701 SP 0013

   SAP kernel....... 721 Patch level. 201

   Database version. "OCI_102, 10.2.0.4.0, V3

   Operating system..... "HP-UX"

   Release.............. "B.11.31"

  

  

Here attached the abap dump file.

Regards,

Ajay Asawa

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Divyanshu,

As per note 1295973 the solution is -

Use a work area "wa" whose type corresponds to the line type of the actual parameter.

But we did not get what we will do for above solution.

Shall I apply this snote on system?

Regards,

Ajay Asawa

former_member188883
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Ajay,

Can you try with SAP kernel 721 SP300.

Regards,

Deepak Kori

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Deepak,

Right now the exiting version of kernel is 721 and patch level is 201 which is latest one.

I think other all transaction and programs are working fine on patch level 201 only one tocde have problem so only work on that

I got some notes from SCN and also tried to implemented on test system but the problem is till same.

Any idea for which is correct note to applying and close the issue

Regards,

Ajay Asawa