cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

oDelivery proposal-different dates in ATP process

former_member232086
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Team,

Pls help to understand the scenario below for ATP;

Sales order requested date is -20.08.2014-quantity 1000

Existing stock                    -              0

Open production order –date in MD04 and actual end date in PO-21.08.2014-quantitiy 1000

Now when am trying to do ATP check it shows as,

Dely/Conf.Date  23.08.2014 / 21.08.2014 Confirmed qty- why there are two different dates in ATP delivery proposal tab. How 23.08.2014 is showing ? which is the date system considers for ATP?

Thanks for the advise,

Regards,

  Vijesh


Moderator message:

Discussion locked.

Reason: Basic & no effort on search & trail.

Suggestion to OP: We would advise you review SCN Rules of Engagement:

A good way to search the forum is with Google. Refer following blog link :

http://scn.sap.com/community/support/blog/2012/04/16/getting-the-most-out-of-google-optimizing-your-...

The discussions are not a replacement for proper training.

This blog describes how to use the SCN search: http://scn.sap.com/community/about/blog/2012/12/04/how-to-use-scn-search


Therefore, you need to put some effort in search & trail, before you post your query as discussion. In addition that for better respond, explain your effort & understanding on that. Because " Asking Good Questions in the SCN Discussion Spaces will help you get Good Answers.

Message was edited by Moderator: Jyoti Prakash

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

venu_ch8
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Dear Vijesh

Please check factory calendar 

former_member232086
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Venu,

Can you pls help me to how to make the changes in factory calendar

Regards,

Vijesh

jpfriends079
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Vijesh.vijayan


vijesh vijayan wrote after the Moderator posted his comment in initial post:

Hi Venu,

Can you pls help me to how to make the changes in factory calendar

Regards,

Vijesh

It seems like you are ignoring Moderator's remarks.

Again," Discussions are not a replacement for proper training."

Thanks & Regards,

JP