on 07-31-2014 10:03 AM
Dear Gurus,
I am seeking valuable suggestions reg the price update in scheduling agreement.
I am aware of the fact the the same can be done in the below mentioned ways-
1) Manually
2) Through condition records
I would be seeking the best possible option to the update the price in scheduling agreements, options would be
1) Manually @ item level
2) Changing condition records ( VK12) with same validity period
3) Changing condition records ( Vk12) with new validity period ( closing the old validity period)
This is because to avoid any inconsistency in the future.
Regards,
Ajit
Dear Ajit,
Please go ahead with the price update through condition record based on your scenario and it is recommended way .
Regards,
C.B Reddy
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
It is always recommended to update the condition records via VK11 and not VK12. Once this is updated, you can very well update all open scheduling agreements en mass via VA35.
G. Lakshmipathi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear Ajit,
1.Manual entry -
Manual entry will be applicable in only some cases and you cant able to track if some one has changed the price and it is having limitation .
2.through condition records-
where as if you maintain the price through the access sequence and user cant able to change the price manually and for different combination and different material you can maintain different prices .here there is no limitation and you can extend this price for different combination in future .
Based on the above points you take decision.
Regards,
C.B Reddy
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear Mr. Reddy,
Thanks for your valuable reply. This is a scenario in which price update has come in between, so need to take care while changing the price.
The following things have to be taken in consideration while doing the same-
1) Manual changes are on priority
2) Condition records are maintained.
Pls suggest based on the above mentioned points.
Rgds,
Ajit
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.