on 06-16-2014 11:15 AM
Hi Friends,
Getting error
ERROR: The ASSERT condition was violated. (termination: RABAX_STATE) in quality system after clicking on "Access Request".
While creating access request.
Working fine in DEV.
Any idea please?
BR,
Mangesh
This message was moderated.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Mangesh,
Can you provide the snapshot's of ST22(Dump analysis) and SLG1.
Thanks
KH
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi KH,
ST22 Error
Category | ABAP Programming Error |
Runtime Errors | ASSERTION_FAILED |
ABAP Program | CL_SALV_WD_BL_DB_ACCESS=======CP |
Application Component BC-WD-CMP-ALV-ABA
Date and Time | 16.06.2014 15:21:38 |
Error analysis
The following checkpoint group was used: "No checkpoint group specified"
If in the ASSERT statement the addition FIELDS was used, you can find
the content of the first 8 specified fields in the following overview:
" (not used) "
" (not used) "
" (not used) "
" (not used) "
If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
keywords:
"ASSERTION_FAILED" " "
"CL_SALV_WD_BL_DB_ACCESS=======CP" or "CL_SALV_WD_BL_DB_ACCESS=======CM005"
"DETERMINE_DB_KEY"
Information on where terminated
Termination occurred in the ABAP program "CL_SALV_WD_BL_DB_ACCESS=======CP" -
in "DETERMINE_DB_KEY".
The main program was "SAPMHTTP ".
In the source code you have the termination point in line 30
of the (Include) program "CL_SALV_WD_BL_DB_ACCESS=======CM005".
There is no SLG1 error for this in system.
BR,
Mangesh
Hi Colleen,
No configuration changes done recently. I have configured it as per standard docs.
working fine in DEV, but not in QUA.
Just transported the workflows today for Access request, SOD review, EAM log review and UAR and though they have been transported properly, but none is working and producing result.
Could you please specify what exactly you want me to put screenshot of?
Thanks and BR,
Mangesh
Hi ,
Check syntax error in class CL_SALV_WD_BL_DB_ACCESS.I think that might be due to personalization.Have you done any user specific personalization and or administrative personalization for this application? You can check this using WDA application
WD_ANALYZE_CONFIG_DEFAULT
WD_ANALYZE_CONFIG_USER
WD_ANALYZE_CONFIG_COMP
Thanks
KH
Hi Mangesh
is this happening on NWBC Screen to create a new access request? Which webdynpro link are you clicking? Is it the end user access request or the GRC user one (i.e. does the user have an SU01 account in GRC)
if it's for an access request, did you complete all the CUP/ARQ IMG configuration including your data sources.
These are the sorts of context and screen shots that would all us to help provide assistance. As well as that which release/SP you are on.
If working in DEV and no QA, then suggest you compare your configuration between the two systems to find the gap.
Regards
Colleen
Hi Colleen,
Yes, it is happening on NWBC screen when I click on "Access Request" to create access request.
I have completed the ARQ configuration including data source configuration.
I am on AC10 SP10.
Which screenshot do you want, please suggest, I will post them.
I compared DEV and QA configuration wise. they both look same.
UAR and EAM review working fine and system is allotting numbers to request properly for UAR, so I gues number range config is fine.
Yesterday I transported my WF, I checked WF in simulation mode, it was giving message as no active version available , then I generate them in QAS, UAR and EAM log review are working fine, but SOD and AR workflow though have active version still not working.
BR,
Mangesh
Have you Maintained Data Sources? After doing so, did you run your user sync?
When you click on new request it will default the EUP values
You could try to ST05 trace to the dump and look at the SQL selects prior to the error message
The WF shouldn't be an impact until you submit access.
Regards
Colleen
Hi Colleen,
Nope, it is not end user screen, I am logging as an administrator with GRC super admin rights.
I got update from SAP that this issue is due to difference in ALV configuration and they suggested as suggested by to check webdynpro applications with
WD_ANALYZE_CONFIG_USER
WD_ANALYZE_CONFIG_DEFAULT
WD_ANALYZE_CONFIG_COMP
To find and remove the ALV personalization, but I am now aware how to use it, could you suggest steps to use it.
Hi KH,
Could you suggest how to use the webdynpros and what to check, any documentation or step by step check doc, would be great help.
BR,
Mangesh
Hi Mangesh,
Four Web Dynpro Components are offered which you can use analyzing your application/component/configuration:
You can check the usage of that webdynpro components here in this below links
** TEAM FPM ** - Analyzing your FPM Application (in general, customizing, enhancements, ...)
Analysis and Administration of Web Dynpro ABAP Adaptations
Deleting the User Personalization done on Enterprise Portal
Thanks
KH
Hi Mangesh,
Four Web Dynpro Components are offered which you can use analyzing your application/component/configuration:
You can check the usage of that webdynpro components here in this below links
** TEAM FPM ** - Analyzing your FPM Application (in general, customizing, enhancements, ...)
Analysis and Administration of Web Dynpro ABAP Adaptations
Deleting the User Personalization done on Enterprise Portal
Thanks
KH
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.