cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Goods Movement for Inspection

Former Member
0 Kudos

We are in need automatic proposal of goods movement on Goods Receipt against purchase order. If Material is active for QM, then it has to be proposed movement type 103 otherwise it proposed for 101.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Craig S,

Thanks for your response. There are two material in purchase order, one is inspection type activate and others are not QM activate. When we use t.code “MIGO” for Goods receipt against purchase order of these two material then client required that QM activated material should automatically go for GR block stock and inspection lot create and other one is go to  unrestricted stock in one transaction.

former_member42743
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

This is pretty standard.  If 01 inspection type is set up it goes to QI stock (if "post to unrestricted" indicator is not on),.. If not it doesn't.  Nothing would go to blocked stock.

Please search.

Craig

anand_rao3
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

The sentence stands correct if it is read as "QM activated material goes to quality inspection stock instead of GR blocked stock"! I would rather say inspection types never decide which material movement should be performed.

BTW any specific reason why this is needed? Even if we consider the standard QM, the material goes to QI after 101. It thus anyhow restricts material's usage until it is transferred to unrestricted use. How does this make difference in your case if the material is posted to block stock after GR and not in to QI?

Reards, Anand

aniket_gautam
Participant
0 Kudos

hi,

The material for which qm view activated(inspection type 01) goes to Gr block stock

Do the MIGO  with movement type 103,inspection lot will get create automatically and while doing ud of the lot in 'inspection lot stock' tab u will find 'gr block stock indicator tick' put the stock in gr block stock.

former_member42743
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Your posting was reported for failing to search as GR against a Purchase order if pretty standard functionality.

Your second sentence however, was confusing and I didn't understand it.  Can you maybe clarify your question a bit and lets us know more about what you are looking for?

Otherwise, I'll have to block this posting.

Thanks,

Craig (moderator)