on 05-14-2014 11:26 AM
Hi Vijesh Vijayan,
This is for your update that if you follow the sequence in your scenario that you will be able to CIF the required master data.
1) CIF -Location Master first
2) CIF - Material and Location Master later
Note: If you have already ciffed the location master and you are not sure of the integration model, go to CFM5 and find out the integration model.
Note2: Error mentioned in your screenshot is just an information, go ahead and generate the integration model and do CFM2.
Let me know, once you are done with the above steps.
Thanks
Sai Dacha
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Now the CIF is working fine, i have transferred the ATP check from ECC to SCM..but the ATP check group which are available in ECC is not showing in SCM...may i know why??any error in CIF or i need to configure the availability check group in APO separately ?
thanks for the help,
Regards,
Vijesh
Hello Vijay,
You need to have the ATP group configured in APO system separately. But, if you do not want to configure it separately, you can CIF the ATP Customizing by creating a separate integration model for this. You may have already observed the check box 'ATP Customizing' already. That may help you. But, creating it separately in APO is always manageable. For example if you have an ATP group say 12, and if the sales order is doing an ATP check for the mAterial plant combination that has the ATP group as 12 will go to APO and fetch the already configured details of the Checking Group 12 and the ATP functionality will work as configured in APO
Hope this helps
Babu Kilari
Hello Vijesh,
Please go to APO and configure the ATP checking group settings here
(1) Advanced Planning and Optimization-> Global Available-to-Promise (Global ATP)->Product Availability Check -> Maintain ATP Group
(2) Advanced Planning and Optimization-> Global Available-to-Promise (Global ATP)-> Product Availability Check -> Maintain Check Control
Hope this helps. Close the thread once the issue is resolved.
Babu Kilari
Hi Vijesh,
In CFM1, Please Check the "Plants" check box and enter the plant in the selection criteria.
This is just a warning message from the system, asking for the Missing Plant in the selected Integration Model.
Please let me know if the message still persists(even after Plant Selection).
Thanks,
Santosh KB.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Vijesh,
It is just a warning message, which will not stop processing further. So I suspect, the transfer should be successful in your case.
Activate your IM using CFM2 and do let us know if there are errors during activation.
In case, if you are facing troubles with Change Transfer, do a Initial Supply using Report "RIMODINI"(R3) for that particular Integration Model.
Also, you can check for more information on CIF logs with T-code CFG1(in R3) and /SAPAPO/C3(in SCM).
Thanks,
Santosh KB.
Hi Vijesh,
Please check if you have CIFed the plant. No material can be CIFed to APO without the respective locations CIFed. Please check if the plant 1011 is maintained in any of the IM with CFM5.
This should give the integration model which has plant CIFed in it.
You try to deactivate and activate the IM related to plant and reCIF the same.
And then try to CIF the material.
Thanks,
Rag
Hi Vijesh,
Try sending plant first, followed by other objects. Please let me know if you still face any issue.
rgds
Sourabh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Vijesh,
Looks like a plant relevant error. Is this the only plant for which you're facing this error ? If yes - did you try to set up the plant manually and try to create the CFM1 Integration model for the same material - plant combination. Perhaps, that should work.
I am not sure of the exact cause here, however it may be a good idea to revisit the plant type defined at the R/3 side. Has it been defined properly ? Is system confusing as to which location type would it have get created in APO ? Just my thoughts.
Babu Kilari
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
8 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.